HAK KONSTITUSIONAL ATAS AIR PASCA DIHAPUSNYA UNDANG UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG SUMBER DAYA AIR OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

Nova Yarsina

Sari


The purpose of this study is to examine human rights over water after the abolition of Law Number 7 of 2004 concerning Water Resources by the Constitutional Court. The research method used is normative juridical. Later there was an opinion that if the state was unable to guarantee the fulfillment of human rights over water, then the water supply was carried out by a third party. The state must regulate the appropriateness of control over water sources, affordability of prices, guarantees for water health. For the realization of these things, a system of regulation must be made. An independent regulatory body can also be formed, public participation, and sanctions against violations. In essence, every regulation issued by the local government related to water use actually makes water as "Economic goods". Commercialization and privatization of water services is not an illegal thing as long as it can improve clean water services so that public access to water also increases. Local governments should be able to understand that commercialization of water resources by setting drinking water tariffs that exceed the capacity and reasonableness of the community actually results in reduced community access to water resources, especially clean water and drinking water. The poor and marginalized are the most vulnerable groups to the failure to fulfill the right to water by the State. To see the extent to which the fulfillment of the right to water by the state apart from the perspective of the executive authority, it is necessary to look at court decisions that can reflect the fulfillment of the right to water especially after the abolition of Law Number 7 of 2004 concerning Water Resources by the Constitutional Court and return to Law Number 11 of 1974 concerning Irrigation.

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Ali, Zainuddin, 2010, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan 2, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Arikunto, Suharsimi, 1992, Prosedur Penelitian, Cetakan 8 , Jakarta:PT. Rineka Cipta.

Arinanto, Satya, 2008 Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Transisi Politik Di Indonesia, Depok: Pusat Studi Hukum Tata Negara FHUI.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly, 2006, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, Jilid II, Jakarta:Konstitusi Press.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly, Cita Negara Hukum Indonesia Kontemporer, orasi ilmiah pada Wisuda Sarjana Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya Palembang.

Chal.id, Hamid , 2009, Hak-Hak Asasi Manusia Atas Air: Studi Tentang Hukum Air di Belanda, India dan Indonesia, Disertasi Doktor Ilmu Hukum FHUI, Jakarta: Program Pasca Sarjana Strata 3.

Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum Republik Indonesia, 2013, Buku Informasi Statistika, Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum Republik Indonesia , Jakarta.

Mardalis, 2010, Metode Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Proposal, Cetakan 15, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Marzuki , Peter Mahmud, 2009, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Press.

Muhammad, Abdulkadir, 2004, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan I, Jakarta: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rosemary Lyster, “The Current Status of Water Law in New South Wales.” Makalah dalam seminar tentang Water Law Reform in New South Wales, the Faculty of Law, the University of Sydney.

Soekanto , Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji, 2011, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

UN ECOSOC, Committee on Economic, Social & Cultural Rights, General Comments No. 15: The Rights to Water.

WHO, 2010, The Global Water Supply and Sanitation Assessment 2000, Geneva.

Williams, Mellina, 2007,“Privatization and The Human Right to Water: Chal.lenges for The New Century,” 28 Michigan Journal of International Law 469.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/esr.v3i2.774

Jumlah Kunjungan

Web Analytics Made Easy -
StatCounter
Anda Pengunjung Ke- Flag Counter