TINJAUAN YURIDIS TENTANG GABUNGAN TINDAK PIDANA SEBAGAI HAL YANG MEMBERATKAN PIDANA Studi Kasus: Putusan Perkara Nomor:141/Pid.B/2018/PN Mrj (Pencurian)

Failin Failin

Sari


In criminal law there is no penalty if there is no wrongdoing, this basis is about the accountability of a person for the actions he has done. Therefore, in criminal law there are exceptions to such criminal liability, for example contained in Articles 48, 49, 50 and so forth. In addition, there are burdensome things that will be imposed on the accused for crimes committed, such as samenloop, recidive and so on. In the Muaro Sijunjung District Court there is one case concerning a combination of criminal acts, namely theft crimes accompanied by violence and moreover this theft is carried out among families (theft in the family). In this case the judge has decided the prison sentence for 6 (six) Years. But according to the analysis of the author there is no sense of justice for the victim because this perpetrator is the husband of the victim's child so that there is no deterrent effect for the perpetrator, the reason that there is no more theft in this family because no matter how small the crime committed by a person must be taken action in order to obtain justice and legal certainty. In principle, judges have the freedom to determine the measure of punishment to be imposed on the perpetrators of crimes, as long as it does not exceed the maximum provisions specified in the Criminal Code. Therefore, the sentencing of the accused for a combination of crimes committed by means of pure absorption Stelsel that is If a person commits several acts that are several delik each threatened with a different kind of criminal

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Buku

Amir Ilyas, 2012, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Memahami Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana sebagai Syarat Pemidanaan, Mahakarya Rangkang Offset, Yogyakarta.

Bambang Poernomo, 1985, Azaz-azaz Hukum Pidana, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.

Departemen Kehakiman RI, 1985, KUHP, Terjemahan Resmi, Sinar Harapan Jakarta.

Djoko Prakoso, 1984, Tindak Pidana Penerbangan di Indonesia,Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.

Gerson W Bawengan, 1979, Hukum Pidana di Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Pradya Paramita, Jakarta.

Hans Kelsen, 2011, General Theory of Law and State, diterjemahkan oleh Rasisul Muttaqien, Nusa Media, Bandung.

Kunthoro Basuki, 2001, Dimensi Hakim Aktif Dalam Perspektif Putusan Yang Bersifat Menyelesaikan Perkara, Mimbar Hukum, Yogyakarta.

Mr. Utrecht, 1979, Hukum Pidana dalam Teori dan Praktek, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.

P.A.F. Lemintang, 1984, Dasar-Dasar Hukum-Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Sinar Baru, Bandung.

R. Soesilo, 1984, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Pidana Peraturan Umum dan Delik-Delik Khusus, Politea, Bogor.

R. Soesilo, 1991, KUHP serta Komentar-komentarnya lengkap Pasal demi Pasal, Politea, Bogor.

R. Tresna, 1959, Azaz-azaz Hukum Pidana, PT. Tiara, Jakarta.

Satochid Kartanegara, Hukum Pidana, Balai Lektur Mahasiswa.

Wirjono Prajodikoro, 1984, Azaz-Azaz Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Baru, Bandung.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Republik Indonesia

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Internet

https://putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id/putusan/3f8c52e536b135e32ae4fc5002d6bab2




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/esr.v3i2.792

Jumlah Kunjungan

Web Analytics Made Easy -
StatCounter
Anda Pengunjung Ke- Flag Counter