PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSANTERHADAP TERDAKWA PELAKU PENCABULAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANAK (Putusan Nomor 38/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN.Pdg)
Sari
The crime of sexual abuse committed by children is regulated in Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection and Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the juvenile criminal justice system (SPPA). The recent rise in cases of criminal acts of sexual abuse committed by children has become very worrying. In accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Law enforcers are obliged to seek diversion for children involved in criminal acts, but in the case of children who commit criminal acts of sexual immorality, diversion cannot be attempted. In the case of children as perpetrators of sexual abuse, it is certainly not easy to decide on sanctions against them, considering that they still have the rights to grow and develop. The judge's considerations in handing down a decision against the perpetrator of sexual abuse committed by a child based on Number 38/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN.Pdg consist of: Juridical considerations, namely the indictment which is the legal basis in criminal proceedings, witness testimony is the main consideration taken into consideration by the judge in the decision, the defendant's statement is what the defendant stated at trial was valid evidence, as well as the evidence that the defendant used in the theft. Non-juridical considerations are the background of the defendant who did it due to economic factors, lack of understanding about religion and belief, the application of crimes against perpetrators committed by children based on Number 38/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN.Pdg has been regulated in article 81 paragraph ( 2) in conjunction with article 76E of Law Number 17 of 2016 concerning the stipulation of government regulations in lieu of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning the second amendment to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning child protection and Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Law criminal procedures and other relevant laws and regulations”, Sentencing Adrian Rahma Doni's child Rian for 1 (one) year and 3 (three) months.
Keywords: Judge's Consideration, Crime of Obscenity, Juvenile Justice SystemTeks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Adami Chazawi,.PelajaranHukumPidana 2. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. 2014,
Adnan Paslyadja, Hukum Pembuktian, Pusat Diktat Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia, Jakarta, 1997.
Agus Rusianto. Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Tinjauan Kritis Melalui Konsistensi antara Asas, Teori, dan Penerapannya. Surabaya: Kencana. 2015
.
Amir Ilyas, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, RangkangEducation, Yogyakarta, 2012.
Andi Hamzah. TerminologiHukumPidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2009.
Bambang Waluyo, Pidana Dan Pemidanaan, Ed. 1, Cet. III, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2008.
Darwin Prinst, Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Praktik, Djambatan, Jakarta, 1998.
Lilik Mulyadi, Hukum Acara Pidana, (suatu Tinjauan Khusus Terhadap Surat Dakwaan, Eksepsi dan Putusan Pengadilan), Cet. II. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2002
Mahrus Ali, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2001.
Maidin Gultom. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama. 2008
Mukti Arto, Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2004
Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum di Indonesia, Bima Aksara, Jakarta, 1985.Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Renika Cipta, Jakarta, 2008.
Nursariani Simatupang. HukumPerlindunganAnak. Medan: Pustaka Prima. 2018,
P.A.F Lamintang, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indosenia, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1997.
Rahman Syamsuddin & Ismail Aris, Merajut Hukum Di Indonesia, Mitra Wacana Media,Jakarta, 2014.
R.Soesilo, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Pidana Peraturan Umum dan Delik-Delik Khusus, Politea, Bogor, 1948
Sudarto, Hukum Pidana 1A-1B.Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, 1991,
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, PT .Eresco, Bandung, 1986.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eer.v5i3.2048
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Anda Pengunjung Ke-