PERMASALAHAN HUKUM YANG BERKAITAN DENGAN UANG PENGGANTI

Triadi Triadi

Sari


The mechanism for implementing criminal compensation for compensation, which is usually more than one month, namely around three months or more, is not in accordance with the provisions of Article 18 paragraph (2) of the Corruption Eradication Law, where the payment period exceeds that which has been determined, namely only one month, and the mechanism for paying criminal compensation money which is done in installments (non-cash) itself does not even have a strong legal basis, even though the purpose of such payments is to make it easier for those convicted of corruption to pay off the replacement money, this convenience does not encourage an increase in the number of convicts who paid the replacement money, but still served the subsidiary sentence, namely prison. Differences in concepts, both in calculating the amount of state losses and in the form of accountability in the form of compensation for state losses caused by criminal acts of corruption, between auditors and prosecutors, result in uncertainty regarding whether or not the accountability of a person convicted of corruption will be complete and the term of the subsidiary crime, as well as the amount of arrears that cannot be reached. guarantee to show that it is the result of a criminal act that has not been accounted for.

Keywords: Legal Issues, Replacement Money.

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Abidin Farid Zainal, 2005, Hukum Pidana I, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Adami Chazawi, 2005, Hukum Pidana Materiil dan Formil Korupsi di Indonesia. Malang, Bayu Media Publishing.

Andi Hamzah, 2012, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan dan Perkembangannya, Softmedia, Jakarta.

Asri Wijayanti, Lilik Sofyan Achmad, 2011, Strategi Penulisan Hukum, Lubuk Agung, Bandung.

Budiman Slamet, 2015, Penghitungan kerugian negara dalam audit investigatif (Materi Widyaiswara Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan).

Caroline Kasemetan, 2015, Implementasi Sanksi Pidana Pembayaran Uang Pengganti dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Universitas Atmajaya.

Evi Hartanti, 2008, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jakarta, sinar Grafika.

Fajar Sugianto, 2013, Economic Analysis of Law Seri Analisis Keekonomian Tentang Hukum, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

Mohd. Din, 2015, Kebijakan Pidana Qanun Aceh dalam Preskriptif Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, No. 67, Th. XVII.

Muhammad Rustamaji, 2017, Pembaruan Hukum Acara Pidana Melalui Telaah Sisi Kemanusiaan Aparat Penegak Hukum, Vol. 19 No. 2.

Ridwan, 2014, Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi melalui Peran Serta Masyarakat, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 16, No. 3.

Ridwan, 2013, Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 15 No. 2.

Sidik Sunaryo, 2004, Kapita Selekta Sitem Peradilan Pidana, UMM Press, Malang.

Simorangkir, Rudy T. Erwin, Prasetyo, 2007, Kamus Hukum, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika. Sulaiman, 2015, Pengembanan Hukum Teoretis dalam Pembangunan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 17 No. 3.

Sulaiman, 2017, Building An Anticorruption Morality Among Caretaker Of The Oretical Law In Indonesia, Tadulako Law Review, Vol. 2 No. 1.

Syamsul Bahri, 2015, Korupsi dalam Kajian Hukum Islam, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 17 No. 3.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eer.v5i3.2059

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Anda Pengunjung Ke- Flag Counter