STUDI KOMPARASI REGULASI DAN IMPLEMENTASI PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DAN KORBAN NEGARA INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT
Sari
This research aims to conduct a comparative study between regulations and implementation of witness and victim protection in Indonesia and the United States. The existing problem phenomenon shows that witnesses and victims of crime often have their safety and security threatened, requiring a protection system that is effective and responsive to their needs. This research uses empirical juridical methods, combining juridical legal analysis with empirical data obtained from direct observation and related sources. It was found that in Indonesia, the protection of witnesses and crime victims is integrated in legal frameworks such as the Criminal Procedure Code, Criminal Code, and Law no. 13 of 2006. The Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK) has an important role in implementing various protection mechanisms. Meanwhile in the United States, witness protection is regulated in the Witness Protection Act 1984 with the Bureau of Prisons and the U.S. The Marshals Service plays a vital role in supervising and protecting witnesses. The results show important differences in approaches to witness and victim protection between the two countries. The United States offers an intensive protection system through a structured witness protection program, while Indonesia emphasizes a broad legal framework with implementation based on independent institutions.
Keywords: Witness and victim protection, regulations, implementation.
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Aryadi, G. Tinjauan terhadap UU No. 13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban Perspektif Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta: FH-UAJY, 2011.
Handoko, D., & Sukri, B. (2018). Perbandingan Regulasi Tindak Pidana Tanpa Korban Di Kawasan Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia, Dan Arab Saudi). Hawa dan AHWA.
Hutama, D. S., Arfah, M. M., Abdulloh, M. N. M., Arwani, M. I., & Habibi, M. W. (2023). Whistleblower dengan Perspektif Perlindungan Hukum Pelaporan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Perbandingan Negara Indonesia dengan Negara Amerika Serikat. Jurnal Anti Korupsi, 3(1), 46-56.
Julianto, Bambang. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Dan Korban Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 5, no. 1 (1 Januari 2020). https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss1.art2.
Kenedi, John. Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (Studi Perlindungan Hukum Korban Kejahatan dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2020.
Malinda, A. (2016). Perempuan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Tersangka, Terdakwa, Terpidana, Saksi dan Korban. Garudhawaca.
Murtadho, M Ali. “Pengaturan Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) di Amerika Serikat, Jerman dan Belanda.” Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya Malang, 16
Ruchoyah, R. (2020). Urgensi Plea Bargaining System dalam Pembaruan Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia: Studi Perbandingan Plea Bargaining System di Amerika Serikat. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 27(2), 388-409.
Rasyid, M. A., & Setiawan, I. (2022). Perbandingan Penuntutan Pada Sistem Peradilan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat. Jurnal Ilmiah Publika, 10(2), 425-434.
Sadiawati, D., Dirkareshza, R., & Fauzan, M. (2023). Rekonstruksi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Investasi Bodong: Studi Komparasi Indonesia dan Amerika. Halu Oleo Law Review, 7(2), 149-166.
Sunarso, H. S., Sh, M. H., & Kn, M. (2022). Viktimologi dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Waluyo, B. (2022). Vitikmologi: Perlindungan Korban dan Saksi. Sinar Grafika.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eer.v6i1.2566
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Anda Pengunjung Ke-