PUTUSAN SELA DALAM PERKARA GUGATAN PERDATA TENTANG MASUKNYA PIHAK KETIGA TANPA PERMOHONAN INTERVENSI

Ali Mukni, Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom

Sari


This paper aims to know and describe how the Legal Considerations of the Panel of Judges in Interim Decisions regarding the entry of third parties without a Request for Intervention in civil lawsuit cases are related to the procedural law regarding the procedure for the entry of third parties as tussenkomest intervention plaintiffs, so as to provide an explanation of procedural law regarding the procedure for the entry of third parties as plaintiffs, intervention and the authority of judges in making legal considerations as the basis for interlocutory decisions. This research uses a statutory approach or statute approach, secondary data is analyzed qualitatively, and conclusions are drawn using deductive logic. The entry of a third party in a civil lawsuit case that is independent in nature to defend its rights called tussenkomest intervention, must follow the correct procedure in accordance with the provisions of the civil procedure law, as well as the judge in making a decision must be based on the facts contained in the trial, The judge shall also be subject to and constrained by the provisions or procedural law, to the extent that such procedural law governs it. In civil cases, procedural law aims to create legal order in the process of all stages of the trial and to create legal certainty, An interlocutory judgment granting something not requested is unlawful and a violation of the ultra petita principle.

Keywords: Injunctive Relief, Intervention, Petition, procedural law.


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Lilik Mulyadi, Tuntutan Provisionil dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, (Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2009) Cet. Pertama.

Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012)

Sugiono, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2022.

Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 2015.

Retnowulan Sutantio dan Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Teori dan Praktek. (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2009) Cet. Kesebelas.

Pedoman Teknis Administrasi Dan Teknis Peradilan. Buku II, Edisi 2007, (Mahkamah Agung RI 2008).

Bisariyadi, “Putusan Sela Dalam Perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum”. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 49 No. 2 (2019)

Bambang Sugeng Ariadi S dkk. “Kajian Penerapan Asas Ultra Petita Pada Petitum Ex Aequo Et Bono”, Jurnal Yuridika, Vol. 29 No 1, (Januari - April 2014).

Maya Sartika, “Kedudukan Putusan Pengadilan Yang Sudah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap Dalam Pembatalan Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah” Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, Vol. 2, Nomor 1 (Juni 2019)

Melisa Citra Wardhani & Zakki Adlhiyati, “Studi Tentang Gugatan Intervensi Tussenkomst Pada Gugatan Perkara Perdata (Studi Putusan Nomor 548/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Sby)”. Jurnal Verstek Vol. 9 No. 1, Januari – April 2021.

Puri Galih Kris Endarto, “Tinjauan Yuridis Gugatan Intervensi Tussenkomst sebagai Upaya Hukum Alternatif dalam Gugatan Hukum Acara Perdata Biasa”, Jurnal Pandecta, Vol 5. No 2. (Juli 2010).

Caroline Maria M & Harjono, “Studi Kajian Tentang Gugatan Intervensi Dalam Perkara Perdata”. Jurnal Verstek, Vol. 8 No. 1

Hukum Acara Perdata: Pengertian, Fungsi, Tujuan Serta Sumbernya https://bizlaw.co.id/hukum-acara-perdata/ diakses pada tanggal 26 Mei 2024.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eer.v6i1.2567

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Anda Pengunjung Ke- Flag Counter