EVALUASI KINERJA STRUKTUR BANGUNAN DENGAN METODE PUSHOVER ANALYSIS PADA GEDUNG RUMAH SAKIT STROKE NASIONAL BUKITTINGGI
Sari
Earthquake phenomena are natural phenomena that greatly affect buildings, especially high-rise buildings. Planning of earthquake-resistant building structures is very important in Indonesia, considering that most of the area is located in earthquake areas with moderate to high intensity. Buildings in earthquake-prone areas must be designed to be able to withstand earthquakes. The latest planning trend is performance based seismic design, which utilizes computer-based non- linear analysis techniques to analyze the inelastic behavior of structures from various ground motion intensities (earthquakes), so that their performance can be known in critical conditions. Further action can be taken if it does not meet the required requirements. The purpose of this study was to determine the pushover analysis procedure to evaluate the performance of the building structure and to determine the pattern of the collapse of the building structure after being analyzed by pushover. This study uses the Static Pushover Analysis method with reference to the displacement coefficient method (FEMA 356, 2000). The lateral load used is the result of an equivalent static analysis which is carried out monotonically in one direction. Research shows that there are several conclusions. First, the displacement of the maximum pushover result (δmax) in the XZ direction, which is in step-7, is greater than the displacement target (δt), with a figure of 61541.4681 mm > 58.212 mm. Second, the displacement of the maximum pushover result (δmax) in the YZ direction, namely in step-5, is greater than the displacement target (δt), with a figure of 10450.54 mm > 58.212 mm. Third, the evaluation in the XZ direction is still safe even though max > t, because all beam elements in the portal appear plastic hinges with levels A-B which are still elastic, all marked in pink. The distribution of plastic hinges that occur at all steps shows that no structural member exceeds the performance limit so that it can be said that the performance of the structural component is in a safe condition. Fourth, the structural members in the YZ direction are also safe because max > t and the plastic hinge distribution scheme shows the structural members marked in pink with levels A-B.
Keywords: pushover, non-linear, plastic hinge
Referensi
Afandi, N. R. (2010). Evaluasi kinerja seismik struktur beton dengan analisis pushover menggunakan program SAP 2000.
Arifin, Z., Suyadi, S., & Sebayang, S. (2016). Analisis Struktur Gedung POP Hotel Terhadap Beban Gempa Dengan Metode Pushover Analysis. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil dan Desain, 3(3), 427-
Aziz, A., Rahim, S. A., Orientilize, M., Lase, Y., & Irwan, J. (2012). Studi perilaku sistem rangka baja k-split EBF (eccentrically braced frames) terhadap beban gempa dengan analisis pushover= Study of steel frame behavior with composing of k-split eccentrically braced frames (EBF) system towards earthquake load using pushover analysis
Dewobroto, W. (2005). Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Baja Tahan Gempa denganAnalisa Pushover. Universitas Pelita Harapan.
Frapanti, S. (2018). Studi perhitungan kekakuan portal dinding bata pada bangunan bertingkat dari beberapa negara dengan pushover. Educational Building Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan dan Sipil, 4(1 JUNI), 1-10..
Ginsar, I. M., & Lumantarna, B. (2007). Seismic Performance Evaluation Of Building With Pushover Analysis. fportfolio. petra. ac. id/user_files/73-001/seismic% 20push- ben2. doc Performance Point.
Kurniati, D. (2019). Kajian Analisis Pushover Untuk Performance Based Design Pada Awana Condotel
Yogyakarta. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil, 6(1), 85-93.
Mamesah, H. Y., Wallah, S. E., & Windah, R.
S. (2014). Analisis Pushover pada Bangunan dengan Soft First Story. Jurnal sipil statik, 2(4).
Manalip, H., Windah, R. S., & Dapas, S. O. (2014). Analisis Pushover Pada Struktur Gedung Bertingkat Tipe Podium. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 2(4).
Masril, M. (2019). Analisis Struktur Atas Empat Lantai Dengan Analisis Pushover Menggunakan Program SAP 2000 Studi Kasus: Gedung Kantor Bersama Kabupaten Sijunjung. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 2(1).
Munawaroh, N. A. (2018). Evaluasi Kinerja Bangunan Gedung Dengan Pushover Analisis Menggunakan program SAP2000 (Studi Kasus: Awana Condotel Yogyakarta) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Technology Yogyakarta).
Nugroho, F. (2016). Penerapan Analisis Pushover Untuk Menentukan Kinerja Struktur Padabangunan Eksisting Gedung Beton Bertulang. Jurnal Momentum ISSN 1693-752X, 18(2).
Nurjannah, S. A., & Megantara, Y. (2011). Pemodelan Struktur Bangunan Gedung Bertingkat Beton Bertulang Rangka Terbuka Simetris Di DaerahRawan Gempa Dengan Metoda Analisis Pushover.
Oktopianto, Y., & Andayani, R. (2013). Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Beton Bertulang Dengan Pushover Analysis. Prosiding PESAT, 5.
Pangemanan, S., & Mantiri, H. G. (2017). Analisis Pushover Perilaku Seismik Struktur Bangunan Bertingkat: Studi Kasus Bangunan Ruko. Simposium II UNIID 2017, 2(1), 365-373.
Prabowo, A., & Lase, Y. (2016). Tinjauan Nilai Faktor Modifikasi Respon (R) Dan Faktor Kuat Lebih ( O) Pada Struktur Gabungan Rangka Baja Dan Rangka Beton Bertulang Dengan Analisis Pushover. Jurnal Teknik Sipil ITB, 23(1), 75-88.
Rachman, N. Z., Purwanto, E., & Supriyadi,
A. (2014). Analisis Kinerja Struktur Pada Gedung Bertingkat Dengan Analisis Pushover Menggunakan Software Etabs (Studi Kasus: Bangunan Hotel Di Semarang). Matriks Teknik Sipil, 2(4).
Sultan, M. A. (2017). Evaluasi Struktur Beton Bertulang Tahan Gempa dengan Analisa Pushover. Jurnal Sipil Sains, 6(11).
Surviyanto, A., & Hardono, S. (2018). Penilaian Kinerja Seismik Jembatan dengan Pendekatan Analisis Pushover. Jurnal Jalan- Jembatan, 28(3), 193-204.
Syafrin, P. K., Makarim, C. A., & Yuwono, A. (2020). Analisis Displacement Pada Tiang Tunggal Dengan Menggunakan Metode Pushover Analysis. JMTS: Jurnal Mitra Teknik Sipil, 3(2), 349-
Widyaningrum, A., & Haryanto, Y. (2019). Evaluasi Kinerja Gedung Dinas Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil Purbalingga dengan Analisis Pushover. Din. Rekayasa, 15(2), 87-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/err.v1i1.1105
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Anda Pengunjung Ke-