STUDI EVALUASI PEMANFAATAN PEDESTRIAN SEBAGAI FASILITAS PEJALAN KAKI PADA RUAS JALAN SOEKARNO HATTA KOTA BUKITTINGGI
Sari
Abstract: The development of pedestrian paths for the convenience of users is one of the considerations in the development and improvement of infrastructure quality. The purpose of this study is to analyze and evaluate pedestrian facilities in the Soekarno Hatta Street area, to find out whether the pedestrian path has functioned optimally and whether it meets the planning standards used, and to determine the perceptions and preferences of pedestrian path users. The data collection method used in this research is through random sampling technique, documentation technique, questionnaire or questionnaire, interview technique (interview), while the data processing tool is Microsoft Excel. The results of the research from a physical point of view regarding the location of pedestrian paths with an effective width of ± 1.5 meters already have pedestrian paths that are in accordance with the minimum standards of pedestrian paths in urban areas. For the aspect of user satisfaction on the condition of the pedestrian path, the percentage result is 52.2%. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that for the aspect of user satisfaction on the condition of the pedestrian path, it belongs to the Quite Comfortable (CN) criteria, for perceptions and preferences of the main comfort factor according to respondents, namely the shade must be improved, while for the inconvenience factor, namely too hot and parking. illegal activities, as well as the lack of road signs and infrastructure. Factors to increase comfort are the need to increase lighting facilities, benches, trash cans, and increase shade trees/canopies, analysis of perceptions and preferences about the function of pedestrian paths that choose the function of pedestrian paths as pedestrian paths, city beauty spaces and vehicle waiting rooms as the main priority, namely respondents stated consistent. The research analysis for validity using the SPSS application program from 12 question items regarding the condition of the pedestrian path was declared valid and for reliability it was declared reliable.
Keywords: Comfort, Pedestrians, Pedestrian Paths.
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Baturaja, S., Tbk, P., & Halin, H. (2018). EcoMent Global 167. 3, 167–182.
Direktorat Jenderal Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu Lintas Angkutan Jalan. Dirjenhubdar (2009).
Direktorat Jendral Bina Marga Republik Indonesia. 1999.Tentang Pedoman Perencanaan Jalur Pejalan Kaki Pada Jalan Umum. Departemen Pekerjaan Umum. Jakarta.
Direktorat Pembinaan Jalan Kota. 1990. Petunjuk Perencanaan Trotoar. Jakarta : Direktur Pembinaan Jalan Kota, 1990.
Direktorat Penataan Ruang. 2000. Pedoman Penyediaan dan Pemanfaatan Prasarana dan Sarana Ruang Pejalan Kaki di Perkotaan. Jakarta : Direktur Penataan Ruang Nasional, 2000.
Ditjen Bina Marga. 1991. Pedoman Teknis Perencanaan Spesifikasi Trotoar. Jakarta, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Fruin, J. J. (1971). Pedestrian Planning and Design. Elevator World Inc.
Gideon, Giovany. 1977. Human Aspect of Urban Form.
Hidaya t, A. (2012). Pengertian dan Penjelasan Penelitian Kuantitatif - Lengkap - Uji Statistik. Statistikian.Com.
Hillgard ER. 1978. The Goals of Perception. In. Stephen Kaplan and Rachel Kaplan. Massachucet : Duxbury Press North Scituate.
Indonesia, B.-S. (2019). Statistik Indonesia 2019. Statistical Year Book of Indonesia 2019.
Limpong, Royke; Sendow, Theo K.; Jansen, F. (2015). Pemodelan Fasilitas Arus Pejalan Kaki (Trotoar). Jurnal Sipil Statik, 3(3), 212–220.
Machali, I. (2015). Statistik Itu Mudah, Menggunakan SPSS Sebagai Alat Bantu Statistik. Ladang Kata.
Marliana, RR. 2016. Modul Probabilitas dan Statistika (Praktikum SPSS). Sumedang
Marsh (1991). “ Jenis-Jenis Aspek Kenyamanan”.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Mentri Perhubungan No. 65 Tahun 1993 Tentang Fasilitas Pendukung Kegiatan Lalu Lintas Dan Angkutan Jalan. Jakarta.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 34 Tahun 2006 Tentang Jalan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2006 Nomor 86 § (2006).
Porteous, John Douglas, 1977. Environmental and Behaviour: Planning and Everyday Urban Life. Massachussetts: Addison – Wesley Publishing Company : New York
Pratama, N. (2014). Studi Perencanaan Trotoar Di Dalam Lingkungan Kampus Universitas Sriwijaya Inderalaya. 2(2), 272–277.
Priana, E. S. (2019) Alokasi Kebutuhan Alat Berat Pada Proyek Peningkatan Jalan Bandarejo-Koto Tinggi Kabupaten Pasaman Barat. Rang Teknik Jurnal
Rubenstein, Harvey M. 1987. Central City Malls. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
Saraswaty, R. (2017). Kenyamanan Pejalan Kaki Terhadap Pemanfaatan Trotoar di Jalan Brigjen Katamso Kota Medan. Educational Building.
Setiawan, M. F. (2011). Studi Perilaku Pejalan Kaki Pada Trotoar (Pedestrian Ways).Jurnal Teknik Sipil & PWK, 2, 181–190.
Setiawan, N. (2007). Penentuan Ukuran Sampel Memakai Rumus Slovin dan Tabel Krejcie-Morgan: Diskusi Ilmiah Jurusan Sosial Ekonomi Fakultas Peternakan UNPAD.
Shirvani. Hamid, (1985). “The Urban Design Process. New York : Van Nostrad Reinhold Company”.
Sugiyono. 2007. Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Sukandarrumidi. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian petunjuk Praktis untuk Peneliti Pemula. Yogyakarta : Gadjah Mada University Press
Undang Undang No 22 Tahun. (2009). UU No 22 Tahun 2009. UU No. 22 Th 2009. Trotoar Di Jalan Protokol Kota Semarang (Studi Kasus Jalan Pandanaran Semarang), 15(1), 1–12.
Unterman, Richard K.1984. Accomodating the Pedestrian. Van Nostrad Reinhold Company : USA.
Utama, I. G. B. R. (2016). Teknik Sampling dan Penentuan Jumlah sampel. Universitas Dhyana Pura, Bali, (January), 23.
Widodo, A. (2013). Studi Tentang Kenyamanan Pejalan Kaki Terhadap Pemanfataan Trotoar Di Jalan Protokol Kota Semarang (Studi Kasus Jalan Pandanaran Semarang). Studi Tentang Kenyamanan Pejalan Kaki Terhadap Pemanfataan. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/err.v2i3.1756
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Anda Pengunjung Ke-