DAMPAK PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 35/PUU-X/2012 ATAS HUTAN ADAT SEBAGAI ASSET NAGARI DI PROPINSI SUMATERA BARAT
Sari
In the laws and regulations in Indonesia, ulayat rights are recognized, respected and protected, meaning that the existence/existence of ulayat rights is recognized and protected from all actions that interfere with ulayat rights by anyone, the various kinds of legislation are: First, the Constitution 1945 in article 18 B paragraph (2) contains provisions regarding the recognition and respect for ulayat rights. Second, Article 6 of the MPR Decree No. IX/MPR/2011 on “Agrarian Reform and Natural Resource Management”. Third, Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles. And the fourth is Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights. In addition to the laws and regulations that acknowledge the existence/existence of ulayat rights, there are also denials of ulayat rights in statutory regulations. These laws include: Law Number 5 of 1967 concerning Provisions on Basic Provisions of Forestry, this law was revoked by Law Number 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry. Law Number 41 of 1999 states customary forests as state forests, so that the state can give the forest to a legal subject with a right. This means the denial of the rights of the customary law community to their customary forest and it also means the denial of the customary law community's customary rights. With the issuance of the Constitutional Court's decision No. 35/PUU-X/2012 regarding the review of Law no. 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry, brought fresh air to customary law communities, where in its decision the Constitutional Court has emphasized the existence of customary forests so that the legal certainty of the existence of customary forests is really strong.
Keywords: Decision, Constitutional Court, Customary Forest, Nagari, West Sumatra.
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Abdul Halim, 2009, Teori-teori Hukum Aliran Positivisme dan Perkembangan Kritik-kritiknya dalam Jurnal Asy-Syir’ah Vol. 42 No. II .
Ahmad Rifai, 2010, Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim, Dalam Persfektif Hukum Progresif, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika .
Andi Hamzah, 1996, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta, Sapta Artha Jaya.
Carl Joachim Friedrich, 2004, Filsafat Hukum Perspektif Historis, Bandung, Nuansa dan Nusamedia.
Darji Darmodiharjo, Shidarta, 1995, Pokok-pokok Filsafat Hukum, Apa dan Bagaimana Filosafat Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta, Gramedia.
Emile Durkheim, 1964, The Division of Labor in Society, George Simpson, (transi), New York, The Free Press.
Esmi Wirasih, 2010, Pranata Hukum, Sebuah Telaah Sisologis, Semarang, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Helmi Panuh, 2012, Pengelolaan Tanah Ulayat Nagari, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers.
Laurence M Friedman, “Legal Culture And Walfare State”, Dalam Gunther Teubner (Ed), 1986, Dilemas Of Law In The Walfare State. Berlin-New York, Walter De Gruyter.
Lili Rasjidi dan I.B Wyasa Putra, 1993, Hukum sebagai Suatu Sistem, Bandung, Remaja Rosdakarya.
________ dan Ira Rasjidi, 2001, Dasar-Dasar Filsafat dan Teori Hukum, Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti.
Martua Sirait, Chip Fay dan A.Kuworo, 2000, Bagaimana Hak-Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam mengelola Sumber Daya Alam Diatur, Bogor, ICRAF SE-ASIA.
Muh Dassir, 2008, Pranata Sosial Sistem Pengelolaan Hutan Masyarakat Adat Kajang. Jurnal Hutan Dan Masyarakat. Vol. III No. 2.
Pontang Moerad, 2005, Pembentukan Hukum Melalui Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Perkara Pidana, Bandung, Alumni.
Purnadi Purbacaraka & Soejono Soekanto, 1978, Prihal Kaidah Hukum, Bandung, Alumni.
Roeslan Saleh dikutip dalam Bismar Siregar, 2008, Kata Hatiku, Tentangmu, Jakarta, Diandra Press.
Ronny Hanitijo Sumitro, 1990, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Jakarta, Ghlmia Indonesia.
Satjipto Rahadjo, 1986, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung, Penerbit Alumni.
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 2011, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers.
Sonny Keraf, 1998, Etika Bisnis Tuntunan dan Relevansinya, Yogyakarta, Kanisius.
Syaiful Bakhri, 2009, Pidana Denda Dan Korupsi, Yogyakarta, Total Media.
Van Apeldoorn, 1996, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta, Pradnya Paramita.
World Agroforestry Centre, 2006, Memperkokoh Pengelolaan Hutan Indonesia Melalui Pembaruan Penguasaan Tanah, Bogor, World Agroforestry Centre.
Yance Arizona. 2013. Masyarakat adat dalam kontestasi pembaruan hukum. Makalah disampaikan dalam “Seminar Pemberdayaan Sosial Komunitas Adat: Upaya peningkatan efektivitas pemberdayaan KAT saat ini dan pengembangan kedepan.” Diselenggarakan oleh Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, Hotel Grand Sahid, Jakarta.
________, Peluang hukum implementasi Putusan MK 35 ke dalam konteks kebijakan pengakuan masyarakat adat di Kalimantan Tengah Makalah disampaikan dalam Lokakarya “Fakta Tekstual (Quo Vadis) Hutan Adat Pasca Putusan MK No.35/PUU-X/2012“, Palangkaraya, Rabu 20 November 2013. Acara diselenggarakan oleh AMAN Kalteng dan WWF Program Kalimantan Tengah.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/esr.v4i2.156