PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KEJAHATAN KORPORASI DALAM PEMBAYARAN UANG PESANGON AKIBAT PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA

Irianto Kabes, Vience Ratna Multiwijaya, Aprima Suar

Sari


Abstract: Of the total 536 collective agreements related to layoffs in 2019, only 147 agreements, which is equivalent to around 27 percent, provided layoff compensation in accordance with labor regulations. On the other hand, 384 agreements, or around 73 percent, did not meet the provisions of the applicable law in terms of layoff compensation payments. This research aims to identify corporate responsibility in terms of severance pay due to layoffs., This research carried out using a normative and descriptive approach, using secondary data for qualitative analysis. Deductive logic methods are applied to reach conclusions. with the problem formulation, what is the responsibility for corporate crime in the payment of severance pay due to termination of employment? Research results show that Termination of Employment (PHK) is a termination of the employment relationship between a company and employees which can occur for various reasons, including the employer's initiative, the wishes of workers, legal regulations, or decisions of the Industrial Relations Court (PHI). Layoffs require employers to provide compensation in the form of severance pay, gratuity pay, and compensation for rights in accordance with the provisions. Types of layoffs include changes in company status, efficiency, liquidation, force majeure, bankruptcy, violation of provisions, retirement, and death or permanent disability. Corporations that do not fulfill their severance pay obligations can be subject to criminal sanctions according to various theories of corporate responsibility including strict liability, vicarious liability, direct corporate criminal liability, aggregation theory, and corporate culture model.

Keywords: Corporations, Employment, Crime

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Ahmad, Z. (2022). Pengaturan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (Phk) Menurut Peraturan Perundangan-Undangan Ketenagakerjaan. Hubungan Kerja, 1–35.

Baskoro, N. E. (2020). Konstruksi Teori Hukum Pidana dalam Prepektif RUU Hukum Pidana (Adri Tri Y). cv cendikia pers.

Chamdani, C., Setiabudi, W., & Andarini, V. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Oleh Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Terhadap Pekerja Di Indonesia. Wijaya Putra Law Review, 1(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.38156/wplr.v1i1.68

Earl, S. (2007). Ascertaining the Criminal Liability of a Corporation. Business Law Quarterly.

Fatahillah Akbar, M. (2021). Penerapan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi DalPam Berbagai Putusan Pengadilan. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(3), 807. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no3.3272

Gulo, F. E., & Lie, G. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tenaga Kerja Dalam Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Secara Sepihak. 12(4), 601–612.

Hiariej, E. O. . (2016). , Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Kartasasmita, G. (1995). Kebijaksanaan Publik Dalam Pembangunan: Sebuah Tinjauan Mengenai Lingkungan Kebijaksanaan (Policy Environment). Lembaga Administrasi Negara Bekerjasama Dengan Universitas Padjadjaran.

Krismen, Y. (2014). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Kejahatan Ekonomi. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v4i1.2089

Laia, F., & Laia, L. D. (2023). Penerapan Hukum Dalam Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Trafficking. 2(2), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.31862/9785426311961

Muladi, & Priyatno, D. (2013). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Kencana Prenada Group.

Nelson, A., Christini, J., Sandra, N., Clarissa, F., & Vivianti, W. (2023). Analisis Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Terhadap Perusahaan Industri Startup. YUME: Journal of Management, 6(2), 582–588.

Pemidanaan sebagai Terobosan Hukum atas Penolakan Pengusaha untuk Pembayaran Uang Pesangon Buruh. (2023). LBH Palembang. https://lbhpalembang.or.id/pemidanaan-sebagai-terobosan-hukum-atas-penolakan-pengusaha-untuk-pembayaran-uang-pesangon-buruh/

QC, A. P., & Evans, M. (2008). Corporate Criminal Liability. Sweet & Maxwell.

Ramli, R. R., & Setiawan, S. R. D. (2020). Banyak Perusahaan Tak Bayar Kompensasi Sesuai Aturan, Ini Kata Menaker. Kompas.Com. https://money.kompas.com/read/2020/02/21/080600226/banyak-perusahaan-tak-bayar-kompensasi-sesuai-aturan-ini-kata-menaker

Sjahdeini, S. R. (2007). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Grafiti Press.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (1983). Penelitian Hukum Normatif (1st–10th ed.). PT.RajaGrafindo Persada.

Sonhaji, S. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Akibat Kesalahan Berat Pekerja. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i1.60-78

Wahyuono, K., Wahjuningati, E., & Jamil, K. (2021). Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Di Pt. Langgeng Makmur IndustrI Tbk. Jurnal Judiciary, 1(1), 1–7.

Wibowo, A. P., & Sudiro, A. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja dalam Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PHK) Dengan Alasan Efisiensi. To-Ra, 7(1), 135–152. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/13/first-covid-19-case-happened-in-november-

Yosef. (2008). Perlindungan Hukum Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Karena Kesalahan Berat.

Yusni, M., & Sigalingging, B. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Rangka Untuk Deterrence Effect Dan Effective Detterence. 5(September), 425–437.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/esr.v6i3.2734

Jumlah Kunjungan

Anda Pengunjung Ke- Flag Counter