PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN KORPORASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PERSAINGAN USAHA DI INDONESIA
Sari
Abstract: Corporate accountability in business competition crimes in Indonesia is one of the important aspects in the effort to create a healthy and fair business competition climate. corporations or business entities can act as legal subjects that engage in anti-competitive actions detrimental to public interests, such as cartel monopoly practices or abuse of dominant positions. In the context of law in Indonesia, this business competition crime is regulated by various regulations, especially in. (Law No. 5 of 1999) This research method is used as a way to examine and analyze research problems, with the type of legal research used being normative legal research. descriptive in nature by adopting a regulatory approach (statute approach). In the Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016, Article 4, paragraph (1) states that corporations can be held accountable in accordance with corporate criminal provisions in the law governing corporations. If a corporation is proven to have committed an offense, both administrative and criminal sanctions can be imposed, with the aim of preventing anti-competitive behavior and protecting consumers and other business actors.
Keywords: corporate accountability in criminal offenses.Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Akbar, Muhammad Gary Gagarin, Yuniar Rahmatiar, And Rizki Amanda. “Akibat Hukum Atas Keterlambatan Memberikan Notifikasi Akuisisi Dikaitkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat (Studi Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor 20/Kppu-M/2020).” Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, No. 2 (2022): 31–48.
Anti, Terhadap Perilaku. Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat,” 5ad.
Azizah, Rika, Jacobus Jopie Gilalo, And R Yuniar Anisa. Fungsi Dan Peran Lembaga Kppu Dalam Praktek Persaingan Usaha. Karimah Tauhid 2, No. 3 (2023): 697–707.
Dewi, Silvia. Perumusan Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korporasi Dalam Berbagai Undang-Undang. Arena Hukum 13, No. 01 (2020): 135–56.
Johan, Suwinto. Sanksi Administratif Denda Pendekatan Laporan Keuangan Atas Pelanggaran Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Masalah-Masalah Hukum 51 No. 1 (2022): 20–28.
Mahmud, Ade. Urgensi Dan Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia 8, No. 1 (2022): 70–92.
Mahmudah, Nunung. Illegal Fishing: Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Di Wilayah Perairan Indonesia. Sinar Grafika, 2022.
Mudrika, Mudrika. “Pertangungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Anti Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.” Tadulako University, N.D.
Pangaribuan, Togi. “Perkembangan Bentuk Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korporasi. Law Review 19, No. 1 (2019): 1–24.
Pratama, Arya Putra Rizal, Ria Setyawati, L Budi Kagramanto, And Sinar Aju Wulandari. “Urgensi Pengaturan Leniency Program Terhadap Dugaan Kartel Atas Kelangkaan Minyak Goreng Di Indonesia.” Unes Law Review 5, No. 4 (2023): 2267–83.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/esr.v6i3.2735