TANGGUNG JAWAB BANK TERHADAP AGUNAN NASABAH DI BANK BTN KOTA KUPANG

Sulthanick Abizard, Yossie Maria Yulianty Jacob, Rini Marselin Kaesmetan

Sari


Abstract: Collateral management in credit agreements functions not only as a risk mitigation instrument for banks but also as an essential component of legal protection for customers' rights. Although previous studies have discussed bank liability in credit relationships, limited attention has been given to the implementation of bank responsibility for collateral from the binding process to the return of collateral documents. This study aims to analyze the collateral binding procedure in credit agreements and examine the forms of legal responsibility assumed by Bank BTN Kupang Branch toward customers' collateral. An empirical juridical approach was employed using primary data collected through interviews with two Bank BTN employees and five customers, supported by secondary data derived from statutory regulations and relevant literature. The data were analyzed qualitatively using an empirical juridical approach. The findings reveal that the collateral binding procedure consists of legal verification, document authentication, issuance of a covernote, and the establishment of security rights according to the characteristics of each credit product. The bank's responsibility is implemented through centralized document storage, supervision of notaries and developers under a Service Level Agreement (SLA), and the restoration of customers' rights when document loss or damage results from the bank's negligence. The study concludes that bank liability is not merely remedial after disputes arise but also preventive through the consistent implementation of the prudential principle and fiduciary principle from collateral binding, storage, and supervision to the return of collateral as a form of legal protection for customers.

Keywords: collateral; bank liability; credit agreement; prudential principle; fiduciary principle.


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Harefa, F., Laia, Y., Marbun, J., & Hamonangan, A. (2023). Tanggung jawab bank terhadap perlindungan barang agunan kredit. Jurnal Rectum, 5(1), 766–773.

Nuralisha, M. A., & Mahmudah, S. (2023). Tinjauan yuridis tanggung jawab hukum dalam perjanjian kredit perbankan apabila debitur wanprestasi. Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2364

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2013). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 1/POJK.07/2013 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan.

Pratama, F. A., Yuliawan, I., Irawati, A. C., & Irhamdessetya, H. (2025). Peran hukum dalam menentukan tanggung jawab debitur dalam perjanjian kredit perbankan atas wanprestasi. J-CEKI: Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 4(6), 2850–2859.

Republik Indonesia. (1996). Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan atas Tanah Beserta Benda-Benda yang Berkaitan dengan Tanah. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1996 Nomor 42.

Republik Indonesia. (1998). Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1998 Nomor 182.

Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 4.

Sahi, F., Maramis, R. A., & Tampongangoy, G. H. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban bank terhadap debitur atas hilangnya jaminan sertifikat kepemilikan tanah. Lex Administratum, 13(3).

Sambodo, N. A., Soeprapto, A. W., & Rahmawati, F. A. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban bank terhadap proses eksekusi lelang jaminan yang dilangsungkan sebelum debitur wanprestasi. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP), 5(3).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/err.v5i3.3954

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Anda Pengunjung Ke- Flag Counter