EKSISTENSI HUKUM ADAT SEBAGAI ASSET NAGARI DI PROPINSI SUMATERA BARAT PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 35/PUU-X/2012

Nova Yarsina

Sari


MK Decision No. 35 / PUU-X / 2012 concerning testing Law No. 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry, brought a breath of fresh air to indigenous and tribal peoples, in which in its decision the Constitutional Court has emphasized the existence of customary forests as private forests and is no longer part of state forests as well as serious recognition of the existence of indigenous and tribal peoples. Where in the Constitutional Court's decision No. 35 / PUU-X / 2012 regarding the review of Law Number 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry, the judge tried to provide an ideal decision based on the legal objectives and has been reflected in the ruling elements of justice (Gerechtigkeit), legal certainty (Rechtssicherheit) and expediency (Zweckmassigkeit). These three elements can be found when not only in the Constitutional Court's decision, but in an interrelated legal system. Which, the legal system does not only refer to the rules (codes of rules) and regulations (regulations), but includes a broad field, including the structure, institutions and processes (procedures) that fill it and related to the law that lives in society (living law ) and legal culture (legal structure). As the theory put forward by Laurence M. Friedman that the elements of the legal system consist of legal structure, legal substance and legal culture. Researchers hope that in the future indigenous and tribal peoples can be more affirmed their rights regarding their forest land rights, and regional governments are more responsive to the needs of indigenous and tribal peoples.

Teks Lengkap:

Hal 358-366

Referensi


A. Suriyaman Mustari Pide, 2009, Hukum Adat (Dulu, Kini dan Akan Datang), Jakarta, Pelitas Pustaka.

Abdul Halim, 2009, Teori-teori Hukum Aliran Positivisme dan Perkembangan Kritik-kritiknya dalam Jurnal Asy-Syir’ah Vol. 42 No. II.

Agus Sahbani, MK Tegaskan Hutan Adat Bukan Milik Negara, lihat dalam: http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5194c9568b9f7/mk-tegaskan-hutan-adat-bukan-milik-negara, diakses pada tanggal 7 November 2016.

Laurensius Arliman S, Hukum Adat Di Indonesia Dalam Pandangan Para Ahli Dan Konsep Pemberlakuannya di Indonesia, Jurnal Selat, Volume 5, Nomor 2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.31629/selat.v5i2.320.

Ahmad Rifai, 2010, Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim, Dalam Persfektif Hukum Progresif, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.

Ahmad Sadly Mansur, 2014, Tinjauan Yuridis Eksistensi Hukum Adat Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012 (Kecamatan Kajang Kabupaten Bulukumba Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan), Makasar, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Makasar.

Ammidhan, dan Saafudin (Ed), 2006, Mewujudkan Hak Konstitusional Mayarakat Hukum Adat, Jakarta, Komnas HAM.

Amrinizal, Definisi Atau Pengertian Nagari, lihat dalam: http://www.definisi-pengertian.com/2015/06/definisi-atau-pengertian-nagari.html, diakses pada tanggal 5 November 2016.

Andi Hamzah, 1996, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta, Sapta Artha Jaya.

Bismar Siregar, 2008, Kata Hatiku, Tentangmu, Jakarta, Diandra Press.

Laurensius Arliman S, Partisipasi Masyarakat Di Dalam Pengelolaan Uang Desa Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa, Jurnal Arena Hukum, Volume 12, Nomor 2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2019.01202.5.

Darmini Roza, Laurensius Arliman S, Peran Badan Permusyawaratan Desa di Dalam Pembangunan Desa dan Pengawasan Keuangan Desa, Padjadjaran Journal of Law, Volume 4, Nomor 3, 2017. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v4i2.3433.

Budi Harsono, 2003, Hukum Agraria Indonesia, Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya, Jakarta, Djambatan.

Carl Joachim Friedrich, 2004, Filsafat Hukum Perspektif Historis, Bandung, Nuansa dan Nusamedia.

Cholid Narbuko dan Abu Achmadi, 2002, Metodologi Penelitian, Jakarta, PT.Bumi Aksara.

Datuk Reno Basa, Penghulu Suku Jambak, Anggota Kerapatan Adat Nagari (KAN) Simarasok dan Ketua Badan Perwakilan Rakyat Nagari (BPRN) dan Datuk Indo Marajo, Anggota KAN Simarasok, 14 Juli 2004.

Darji Darmodiharjo, Shidarta, 1995, Pokok-pokok Filsafat Hukum, Apa dan Bagaimana Filosafat Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta, Gramedia.

Djojodigoeno, 1964, Asas Asas Hukum Adat, Yogyakarta, Yayasan Badan Penerbit ”Gadjah Mada”.

Dt. Rajo Mangkuto, H. A. (Walinagari Simarasok), 2005, Kronologi Kejadian pada Guo Simarasok-Tabek Panjang, 24 Februari.

E.Utrecht/Moh. Saleh Djindang, 1990, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia, Jakarta, PT Ichtiar Baru.

Emile Durkheim, 1964, The Division of Labor in Society, George Simpson, (transi), New York, The Free Press.

World Agroforestry Centre, 2006, Memperkokoh Pengelolaan Hutan Indonesia Melalui Pembaruan Penguasaan Tanah, Bogor, World Agroforestry Centre.

Yuliandri, 2010, Asas-Asas Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Yang Baik Gagasan Pembentukan Undang-Undang Berkelanjutan, Cetakan 2, Jakarta, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Yuslim, Kewenangan Gubernur Sebagai Wakil Pemerintah Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Kabupaten/Kota Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, Ringkasan Disertasi, Padang, Universitas Andalas.

Laurensius Arliman S, Kedudukan KPAI dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia, Deepublish, Yogyakarta, 2019.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/esr.v1i3.393

Jumlah Kunjungan

Anda Pengunjung Ke- Flag Counter