ANALISIS YURIDIS OUTSOURCING TERHADAP PERUSAHAAN DAN PEKERJA/BURUH
Sari
Abstract: The author's purpose in conducting research refers to understanding the comparison of the concept of outsourcing between Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower compared to the Job Creation Law No. 6 of 2023, writing this research is important to do in order to find out what things are allowed in the outsourcing system so as not to eliminate legal certainty. The author uses a normative research type that uses secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, namely laws and regulations, secondary legal materials, namely research results and tertiary legal materials obtained from encyclopedias and legal dictionaries, the data is then analyzed qualitatively and conclusions are drawn with deductive logic. In general, this study discusses how changes in the concept of outsourcing between Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower and the Job Creation Law No. 6 of 2023, different concepts will have different impacts on the practice of implementing the concept. The results of this author's research show that with a significant comparison of the concept of outsourcing in the 2023 Job Creation Law regarding the limitations of work implementation related to work agreements, it is contrary to the wishes of workers who are considered detrimental to workers, instead of providing legal certainty to workers, it actually opens up opportunities for companies to be able to outsource work sectors, such as those that are core businesses, and currently no longer use the separation between "work contract agreements" or so-called "worker service provision agreements" work agreements that may be used in outsourcing still have options based on PKWTT with PKWT.
Keywords: Outsourcing/Expert Power; Job Creation; Employment; ComparisonTeks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Abdulkadir Muhammad, 2004, Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Bambang Waliyo, 1996, Penelitian Hukum dalam Praktek, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 1996.
Musni Tambusai, 2006, Hubungan Industrial Era Baru, Kantor Perburuhan Internasional, 2006.
Sehat Damanik, Outsoucing dan Perjanjian Kerja Menurut UU Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan, DSS Publishing, Jakarta, 2006.
Soerjono Soekanto, Ringkasan Metodelogi Penelitian Hukum Empiris, Indonesia Hilleo, Jakarta, 1990.
Tunggal Imam Syahputra, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Ketenagakerjaan, Harvarindo, Jakarta 2009.
Albert Kardi Sianipar, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Outsourcing Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja,” Jurnal Rectum 4, no. 1 (2022): 516–27, https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v4i1.1971.
Dede Agus, “Eksistensi Hubungan Industrial Pancasila Pasca Disahkannya Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja,” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 8, no. 1 (2023): 87–100, https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v8i1.6276.
Sela Nopela Milinum, “Problematika Fleksibilitas Outsourcing (Alih Daya) PascaUndang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Klaster Ketenagakerjaan,” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 3, no. 5 (May 1, 2022): 412–32, https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i5.119.
Syerrin Hakim and Imam Haryanto, “Implementasi Pengawasan Dan Pemberian Sanksi Terhadap Perusahaan Atas Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu,” Jurnal USM Law
Yati Nurhayati, Ifrani, and M. Yasir Said, Methodologi Normatif Dan Empiris Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum, Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 1 (2021): 1–20, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang No.13 tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.
Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja.
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 35 Tahun 2021 tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu, Alih Daya, Waktu Kerja dan Waktu Istirahat dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eer.v6i3.1435
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Anda Pengunjung Ke-