PENDDIDIKAN THE PURE THEORY OF LAW: HANS KELSEN DALAM BIDANG ILMU HUKUM

Abdul Hijar Anwar

Sari


The growth of various schools of thought in legal theory shows a continuous struggle of thought in the field of legal science. If in the past, legal philosophy was a by-product of philosophers, today this position is no longer the case because legal philosophy issues have become separate material for study by jurists. The law of postivism for Hans Kelsen is that it must be cleaned of non-juridical elements, such as sociological, political, historical, even ethical elements. This thought is known as pure legal theory. For him law is a necessity that regulates human behavior as a rational being. In Indonesia, law has a very broad scope, not limited to the textual form of laws and regulations. In the functioning of law in the midst of society, it does not only require laws but other things such as community culture, law enforcement officials and facilities and infrastructure. From this we can see that the flow of positivism seeks to imprison law only textually.

Keywords: The Pure Theory, Law, Hans Kelsen.


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Asep Bambang Hermanto, Ajaran Positivisme Hukum Di Indonesia: Kritik Dan Alternatif Solusinya, Jurnal Selisik – Volume 2, Nomor 4, Desember 2016.

Faisal, 2010, Menerobos Positivisme Hukum, Yogyakarta, Rangkang Education.

FX. Adji Samekto, Menelusuri Akar Pemikiran Hans Kelsen tentang Stufenbeautheorie Dalam Pendekatan Normatif - Filosofis, Jurnal Hukum Progresif, Vol. 7, No. 1, April 2019.

Hans Kelsen, 1995, General Theory of Law and State, Penerjemah: Somardi, 2011, Bandung, Rimdi Press.

Haryono, Eksistensi Aliran Positivisme Dalam Ilmu Hukum, Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Vol. 2 No.1 Tahun 2019.

Herman Bakir, 2007, Filsafat Hukum Desain dan Arsitektur Kesejahteraan, Bandung, PT. Refika Aditama.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2006, Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum, Jakarta, Sekretariat Jenderal & Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.

Koento Wibisono, 1983, Arti Perkembangan Menurut Filsafat Positivisme Comte, Yogyakarta, Gaja Mada University Press.

Lili Rasjidi dan Liza Sonia Rasjidi, 2012, Dasar-Dasar Filsafat dan Teori Hukum, Bandung, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Muhammad Citra Ramadhan, Pengaruh Aliran Positivisme Dalam Kebijakan Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia, Jurnal Warta Edisi : 53 Juli 2017.

Nur Sayyit Santoso Kristeva, 2011. Negara Marxsis dan Revolusi Proletariat: Studi Analisis Ajaran Marxis tentang Negara dan Tugas-Tugas Proletariat di dalam Revolusi Sosial, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.

Putera Astomo, Perbandingan Pemikiran Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum Dengan Gagasan Satjipto Rahardjo Tentang Hukum Progresif Berbasis Teori Hukum, Yustisia Edisi 90 September - Desember 2014.

Rudini T.H. Silaban, 2010, Pemikiran Teori Hukum Murni, Kompas, Jakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto, 2012, Pokok-Pokok Sosiologi Hukum, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers.

Soetandyo Wignjosobroto, 2002, Hukum, Paradigma, metode dan Dinamika Masalahnya, Jakarta, Elsam & Huma.

Soetiksno, 2004, Filsafat Hukum bagian 1, PT. Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.

Teguh Prasetyo dan A.H. Barkatullah, 2013, Filsafat, Teori & Ilmu Hukum, (Pemikiran Menuju Masyarakat yang Berkeadilan dan Bermartabat), Jakarta, Rajawali Pers.

W. Friedmann, Teori & Filsafat Hukum: Telaah Kritis Atas Teori-Teori Hukum (Susunan I), Penerjemah: Mohamad Arifin, 1993, Jakarta, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eer.v5i1.1876

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Anda Pengunjung Ke- Flag Counter