PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM TENTANG PENARIKKAN JAMINAN FIDUSIA YANG TIDAK SESUAI DENGAN UU NO.42 TAHUN 1999

Adinda Putri Elin, Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom

Sari


Arrangements regarding fiduciary guarantees are contained in Law Number 42 of 1999. Fiduciary is a guarantee of trust in a relationship based on feelings between humans and other humans where they feel safe so they have the trust to give property as a place of debt. However, if circumstances state that the debtor has breached the contract, the creditor will execute or withdraw the fiduciary guarantee based on Article


15 of the Fiduciary Law, where the creditor has executorial power in unilaterally declaring a breach of contract against the debtor and then using the debt collector to withdraw the fiduciary guarantee. in withdrawing the guarantee, some debt collectors used violence. This is contrary to Article 28G paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution which explains that every person has the right to protection for itself, family, honor, dignity and property under ourselves control, and has the right to feel safe and protected from threats of fear to do or not doing something which is a human right The Constitutional Court issued a decision on review of laws and regulations, namely Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. First, in 2019, MK Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019, then in 2021 No. 2/PUU-XIX/2021 in these two decisions there is no difference, only the same confirmation. The Constitutional Court's decision resulted in a statement of several phrases regarding Article 15 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Fiduciary Law, namely the first is the phrase “Parate Execution“ and "same as a court decision that has permanent legal force".

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Dedik Priyanto, “ Debt Collector Kerap Bertindak Semena – mena, Etika Islam Melarang Tagih Utang Pakai Kekerasan.” Kompas.Tv ( https://www.kompas.tv/article/209577/debt-collector-kerap-bertindak semena-mena-etika-islam-melarang-tagih-utang-pakai-kekerasan )

Esca Sari Ayu Wulandari, Ridwan, Achmad Syarifuddin “PENARIKAN SECARA PAKSA OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA DALAM HUBUNGAN PERLINDUNGAN ANGSURAN KREDIT DEBITUR” ISSN Print : 2086-809x ISSN Online: 2655-8610, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya, , Notaris Kota Palembang.

Ika Atikah, “Perusahaan Leasing dan Debt Collector Dalam Penagihan Kredit Macet Kendaraan Debitur.” ISSN: 2338 4638, Adalah : Buletin Hukum & Keadilan Volume 2 Nomor 8 C 2018

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Putusan Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, “Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019”

Nur Rizki Siregar, Mohamad Fajri Mekka Putra “Tinjauan Hukum Kekuatan Eksekutorial Terhadap Permohonan Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Atas Debitur Wanprestasi” e-ISSN : 2621-4105, Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Indonesia, Depok

Nurlaili Rahmawati, Sigit Nurhaidi Nugraha “Cidera Janji ( Wanprestasi) dalam Perjanjian Fidusia” ISSN 2721-6160, Jurnal Al-Wasath 2 No.2 h. 76

Nurul Ma’rifah, “Kepastian Hukum terhadap Kreditur Pasca Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 dan Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021” ISSN: 2808 – 7860 Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, hl. 216

Pasal 15 UU No. 42 Tahun 1999

Pasal 1243 KUHPerdata,

Pasal 15 ayat (2) UU No. 42 Tahun 1999

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi

Pasal 15 ayat (3) UU No. 42 Tahun 1999

R. Subekti dan R. Tjitrosudibio, Kitab UU Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijke Wetbok), Jakarta, Balai Pustaka, Cetakan ke-41, tahun 2016, hal. 339

Teguh Prasetyo,”Pembaharuan Hukum: Perspektif teori keadilan bermartabat”,(Malang : Setara Press, 2017), hlm. 170




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v5i3.1797

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Jumlah Kunjungan

Negara Pengunjung

Flag Counter

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.