IMPLIKASI HUKUM TERHADAP PENARIKAN OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA OLEH PERUSAHAAN LEASING SECARA MELAWAN HUKUM (Studi Putusan No. 973/Pdt.G/2015/PN Dps)

Laila Turrahmi; Benni Rusli

doi:10.33559/eoj.v6i1.1957

IMPLIKASI HUKUM TERHADAP PENARIKAN OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA OLEH PERUSAHAAN LEASING SECARA MELAWAN HUKUM (Studi Putusan No. 973/Pdt.G/2015/PN Dps)

Laila Turrahmi, Benni Rusli

Sari

The researcher discusses the problem of Unlawful Actions in Forced Withdrawal of Fiduciary Guarantee Objects (Decision Study Number. 973/Pdt.G/2015/PN Dps) This is done to analyze the case against the implementation of the withdrawal of the fiduciary object by the defendant. This case originated with a credit agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant with the object of collateral in the form of an ISUSU Truck vehicle with the ELF Brand and bound by a fiduciary guarantee. The aim is to find out the unlawful act of withdrawing a fiduciary guarantee object and the form of the judge's consideration of the withdrawal of a fiduciary guarantee object that is carried out unlawfully. The form of research used by the authors is normative juridical, in normative juridical research the authors use literature as relevant secondary data, processing all data that has been obtained by the authors using descriptive data types, the data analysis method used is qualitative. So that from this research the results are obtained, namely the legal consequences of executing fiduciary guarantees that are not registered, the creditor is not legally executing the object of fiduciary guarantees directly, the execution process must be carried out by filing a civil suit to the District Court until a judge's decision has permanent legal force.

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

Alfian, Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia dalam Kontrak Pembiayaan Konsumen, Jurnal Katalogis, Vol. 5, No. 14 (2017)

H. Salim HS, Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia, (Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada,2012)

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

M.A. Moegni Djojodirdjo, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, (Jakarta: Pradnya Paramitha, 2010)

Munir Fuady, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pendekatan Kontemporer, (Jakarta: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005)

Mukti Arto, Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004)

Ni Nyoman Ayu Adnyaswari, dan Suatra Putrawan, Kekuatan Hukum Akta Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, Vol. 6, No. 12 (2018)

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 130/PMK010/2012

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 21 Tahun 2015 tentang Tata Cara Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia

R. Wirjono Projodikoro, Azas azas Hukum Pejanjian, (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2000)

Shavira Ramadhanneswari, R. Suharto, Hendro Saptono, “Penarikan Kendaraan Bermotor Oleh Perusahaan Pembiayaan Terhadap Debitur Yang Mengalami Kredit Macet (Wanprestasi) Dengan Jaminan Fidusia Ditinjau Dari Aspek Yuridis”, Diponegoro Law Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2 (2017)

Sudargo Gautama, Pengertian Tentang Negara Hukum, (Bandung: Alumni, 1973)

Tjoenita, A.T, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitur Terhadap Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Oleh Perusahaan Leasing. Jurnal Imiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya, Vol. 3 No. 1 (2014)

Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang kekuasaan kehakiman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v6i1.1957