STUDI KOMPARATIF PENGATURAN TINDAK PIDANA PENGHINAAN TERHADAP PEJABAT NEGARA MENURUT KUHP DAN UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK

Natasha Octarifana, Lola Yustrisia, Riki Zulfiko

Sari


Insulting state officials is a very immoral act personally, if it is connected with an activity that basically attacks a person's personality then it becomes something that is prohibited, but it becomes a frightening specter for the community that legal certainty is finally being questioned. The formulation of the problem in this study is that the first is how to regulate the criminal act of insulting a state official according to the criminal code, then how to regulate the law on the criminal act of insulting a state official according to the UTE Law. This research is analytical descriptive in nature, meaning that this research aims to provide data about a situation or social phenomena that develop in the midst of society according to facts and without engineering. The approach method used in this study is a normative juridical method, namely the collection of material or research materials aimed at written documents. The results of this research are that in the principle of a democratic state, the relations between the people and the state leaders are interrelated, because there is a check and balance mechanism as a representation of the strengthening of the state in a vertical form. Therefore, any form of lex specialis protection for state officials cannot be justified in a country that adheres to democratic presidential principles. On the other hand, because there has been regulation regarding the insult article in general, therefore the content built into the insult article against state officials is more inclined to create a dictatorship of the ruler in exercising his power. That the life of citizens should have something that guarantees legal certainty. The application of the latest criminal law is a context that has no correlation with the current situation and further advanced conditions that insult state officials through the ITE Law, basically historically the law was used to provide legal certainty for electronic transactions.

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Alviolita, Fifink Praiseda, and Barda Nawawi Arief. "Kebijakan Formulasi Tentang Perumusan Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia." Law Reform 15.1 (2019).

Amir Ilyas, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Memahami Tindak Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Sebagai Syarat Pemidanaan, Yogyakarta, Rangkang Education Yogyakarta & PuKAP-Indonesia, 2012

Fai, Hukum Pidana Adalah. Dalam: https://umsu.ac.id/hukumpidana, Diakses pada tanggal 27 Mei 2023.

Herianto Yudhistiro Wibowo. “Peran Tim Pengawal dan Pengaman Pemerintahan dan Pembangunan Daerah dalam Upaya Mencegah Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Kabupaten Cilacap (Studi Tentang Efektifitas Keputusan Jaksa Agung RI Nomor: Kep152/A/JA.10/2015)”. Jurnal Idea Hukum. Vol. 5, No. 1, Maret 2019.

https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1700546/kasus-haris-azhar-dan-fatia-luhut-kita-lihat-salah-benar-di-pengadilan. di akses pada tanggal 17 Mei 202, Pukul 4.44 WIB.

Huda, Chairul, Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Kencana, Jakarta, 2006

Ishaq, Metode Penelitian Hukum Dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis Serta Disertasi¸ Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017

Karunia, Ana Aniza. "Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Lawrence M. Friedman." Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi 10.1 (2022).

Leden Marpaung, Tindak Pidana Terhadap Kehormatan: Pengertian Dan Penerapannya (Jakarta: Grafindo Persada, 2018.

Mukadir Iskandar, Ilmu Hukum dan Kemasyarakatan, Ciputat, PT Tatanusa, 2016.

Rahayu, Ribut Tulus, Jayusman Jayusman, and Ibnu Sodiq. "Konflik Cina-Jawa di Kota Pekalongan Tahun 1995." Journal of Indonesian History 5.1 (2016).

Roni, Roni, Lola Yustrisia, dan Syaiful Munandar, "Proses Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Data Nasabah Bank Melalu Mesin Atm Sebagai Penyalahgunaan Teknologi Komunikasi Dan Informasi (Studi Putusan Nomor 204/Pid. Sus/2021/PN. Pdg)." Ensiklopedia of Journal 5.4 (2023).

Saputro, Lilik Agus, and Ahmad Syaifudin Anwar. "Menyoal Pasal Penghinaan Presiden Dalam Kuhp: Antara Proporsionalitas Prinsip Primus Interpares Atau Kemunduran Demokrasi." WICARANA 2.1 (2023).

Sukmareni, Efendi Roni, dan Riki Zulfiko. “Perbedaan Hukum Acara Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dengan Pengadilan Umum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana ndonesia”, Jurnal Cendikia Hukum vol. 6 No.2, 2021

Suyanto, Pengantar Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta, Deepublish, 2018.

Tri Jata Ayu Pramesti, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/asas-konkordansi-lt5979a0202a993




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v6i1.1990

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Jumlah Kunjungan

Negara Pengunjung

Flag Counter

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.