ACTIO PAULIANA SEBAGAI MODEL UPAYA HUKUM OLEH KREDITOR TERHADAP PENGALIHAN HARTA KEKAYAAN DEBITOR SEBELUM PUTUSAN PERNYATAAN PAILIT

Jus‘an Ismail, Elfrida Ratnawati

Sari


In implementing bankruptcy, there is often an incident where the debtor has bad intentions which can cause losses to creditors. In the event of bankruptcy, debtors are often found doing things deliberately to avoid their responsibilities regarding debts with creditors. For example, this action is like a debtor trying to hide the assets he owns in the hope that they will not be confiscated by the court regarding payment of the debtor's obligations to creditors. In this writing, there are two problem formulations, namely regarding the legal rules governing actio pauliana in Indonesia in relation to bankruptcy events and regarding efforts to provide legal protection for creditors in connection with the existence of actio pauliana. This writing will be carried out on the basis of normative juridical research methods where library research will be used, because this type of research will be carried out on the basis of secondary materials or library materials only. Apart from that, this research will also use several principles in the field of law and legal theory. The results of the problem analysis that has been carried out are regarding the legal rules governing actio pauliana in Indonesia which are regulated in Article 1341 of the Civil Code which is a general rule and Articles 41-49 of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU. Regarding legal protection efforts that can be provided to creditors in bankruptcy through Actio Pauliana, there are two efforts, namely preventive and repressive protection. Preventive protection efforts in the form of legal regulations regarding actio pauliana in Articles 41-49 of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU and repressive efforts which are also related to allowing creditors to make efforts to request cancellation of the debtor's transfer of assets to third parties.

Keywords: Actio Pauliana, Debtor, Creditor, Bankruptcy


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Anandewi, Made Martia Surya. “Actio Pauliana Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Terhadap Kreditor Dalam Kepailitan.” Jurnal Kertha Desa 9, no. 11 (2021): 28–29.

Asikin, Zainal. Hukum Kepailitan. Cetakan Pe. Mataram: Pustaka Bangsa Press, 2018.

Fitira, Anisa. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Kreditur atas Perbuatan Actio Pauliana yang Dilakukan oleh Debitur Pailit.” Jurnal Lex Jurnalica 17, no. 1 (2020): 7–12.

Ishak. “Upaya Hukum Debitor terhadap Putusan Pailit.” Jurnal Kanun Ilmu Hukum 17, no. 1 (2015): 189.

Ivida Dewi Amrih Suci dan Herowati Poesoko. Hukum Kepailitan: Kedudukan dan Hak Kreditor Separatis atas Benda Jaminan Debitor Pailit. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo, 2016.

Kamilah, Anita. “Penerapan Prinsip Actio Paulina dalam Kepailitan dan Perlindungan Hukumnya Terhadap Pembeli yang Beritikad Baik.” Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justicia 7, no. 2 (2021): 160–76.

Kansil, Christine ST. “Analisis Actio Pauliana Dalam Kepailitan Terkait Pemberian Fasilitas Kredit Terhadap Perusahaan Dengan Jaminan Atas Nama Direksi.” Jurnal Hukum Adigama 1, no. 2 (2019): 12.

Lumbanraja, Brata Yoga. “Analisis Yuridis Kepailitan Harta Yang Ditinggalkan.” Jurnal Notarius 4, no. 1 (2021): 148.

Makmur, Syafrudin. “Kepastian Hukum Kepailitan Bagi Kreditordan DebitorPada Pengadilan Niaga Indonesia.” Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law 4, no. 2 (2018): 345.

Mantilil, Rai. “Actio Paulina sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Bagi Kreditur Menurut KUHPerdata dan UU Kepailitan (PKPU).” Jurnal Jhaper 6, no. 2 (2020): 21–37.

Nugroho, Lucky Dafira. “Itikad Baik Sebagai Tolak Ukur Perbuatan Debitor Dalam Kepailitan.” Jurnal Era Hukum 2, no. 16 (2016): 287.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Perlindungan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2013.

Setiono. Rule of Law (Supremasi Hukum). Surakarta: Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2014.

Shubban, M. Handi. Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2015.

Siahaan, Anggi Hamonangan. “Analisis Yuridis Upaya Hukum Actio Paulina Terhadap Debitor yang Menghibahkan Harta Kekayaannya Sebelum Pailit Berdasarkan UU Kepailitan.” Nommensen Journal of Law 1, no. 1 (2022): 10–16.

Sinaga, Niru Anita, and Nunuk Sulisrudatin. “Hukum Kepailitan Dan Permasalahannya Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 7, no. 1 (2018): 163.

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan (Memahami undang-undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran). Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.

Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina. Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.

Syahrin, M. Alvi. “Actio Pauliana: Konsep Hukum dan Problematikanya.” Jurnal Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2017): 605–16.

Tjitrosudibio, dan Subekti. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek) dan UU No. 1 Tahun 1974. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramitha, 2018.

Waluyo, Bambang. Penelitian Hukum dalam Praktek. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v6i2.2082

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Jumlah Kunjungan

Negara Pengunjung

Flag Counter

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.