ANALISIS PELAKSANAAN KEBIJAKAN MELALUI DISKRESI OLEH PEJABAT NEGARA

Gokma Toni Parlindungan S

Sari


Referring to the discussed material above, several conclusions can be drawn regarding the internalization of the Rule of Law elements into efforts to hold accountable the abuse of authority in discretion (decisions and/or actions) by Government Officials related to corruption offenses involving financial losses to the state. This can be considered a rational thought result inseparable from the first influence, legal politics [outline or basic plan of government's agenda] in the UUAP related to the use of discretion by government bodies or officials in the form of legal policy or official guidelines containing the outline and basic plan of the government as the basis for the implementation of government administration itself. Second, the law enforcement process for officials suspected of committing corruption offenses involving financial losses to the state through the use of discretion must first adhere to the legal norms used by officials in their activities, namely administrative law which conceptually has principles, norms, and characteristics different from criminal law. Third, the issue of freedom to make policies (freis ermessen-discretionary power) falls within the domain of administrative law and thus cannot serve as a basis for criminal prosecution. Therefore, decision-makers and/or actions (discretion) cannot be easily criminalized, ensuring that government bodies and/or officials are not hindered in innovating government administration. 

Keywords: Analysis, Policy, Discretion, Government Officials.    


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Arifin P. Soeria Atmadja, Keuangan Publik dalam Perspektif Hukum; Teori, Kritik, dan Praktik, Rajawali Press, Jakarta:, 2008.

C..F.G. Soenaryati Hartono, et.al., Panduan Investigasi Untuk Ombudsman Indonesia, Komisi Ombudsman Nasional, Jakarta, 2003.

Eko Prasojo, Rancangan) Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan untuk Pembangunan Hukum Administrasi Negara dan Penciptaan Good Governanc”, Makalah disampaikan pada Bimbingan Teknis Hakim PTUN, Jakarta, 31 Maret-2 April, 2021.

H.R. Ridwan, Diskresi & Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah, FH UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2014.

KPK.R.I, Memahami Untuk Membasmi; Buku Saku Untuk Memahami Tindak Pidana Korupsi, MPRcons, Jakarta, 2006.

Miriam Budiarjo, Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik, Jakarta: Gramedia, hlm.57-58., Philipus M Hadjon, 1987, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia; Sebuah Studi tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penanganannya oleh Pengadilan Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara, PT Bina Ilmu, Surabaya, 1982.

M. Ikbar Andi Endang, Diskresi Dan Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pemerintahan Menurut Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Jurnal Hukum Peratun, Volume 1 Nomor 2, Agustus 2018.

Philipus M Hadjon, [et,al], Hukum Administrasi Dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 2011.

Ridwan HR, Hukum Administrasi Negara, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2013.

SF Marbun, Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia, FH UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2011.

Soehino, Ilmu Negara, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2004.

Soetandyo Wignjosoebroto, Hukum Konsep dan Metode, Setara Press (kelompok penerbit Intrans), Malang, 2013.

Tatiek Sri Djatmiati, Diskresi Dalam Konteks UU Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Makalah disampaikan dalam Colloquium membedah Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan (disingkat UUAP), Hotel Garden Palace, Surabaya, 5 Juni, 2015.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v6i3.2441

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Jumlah Kunjungan

Negara Pengunjung

Flag Counter

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.