PERATURAN KOMISI YUDISIAL: JENIS, HIERARKI, DAN IMPLIKASI JUDICIAL REVIEW

Raju Moh Hazmi, Edi Haskar

Sari


Abstract: This research aims to provide an explanation of the conception of the Judicial Commission Regulation; whether it falls into the category of legislation or not. Linearly, as a logical consequence of the hierarchical nature of the legislative system, where is the location/position of the Judicial Commission Regulation when analysing its content. This issue arises because the Judicial Commission Regulation does not explicitly appear in the hierarchy of laws and regulations. Therefore, it has implications for what judicial institution has the authority to test the material validity of the Judicial Commission Regulation if it conflicts with the laws and regulations above it. To unravel these legal issues, normative research is used through conceptual approaches and legislation. The data used is secondary data which includes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Analysis of the data will be presented descriptively qualitatively through the content analysis method. The results of this research found that (1) theoretically, the Judicial Commission Regulation is not included in the category of laws and regulations but falls into the category of internal regulations, but because it is ordered to be formed by law, it is considered to be included in the category of laws and regulations (2) the Judicial Commission Regulation can be equated with the Presidential Regulation in terms of content, so it is equal to the Presidential Regulation in the hierarchical construction of laws and regulations, (3) the Supreme Court is the institution that has the authority to materially examine the Judicial Commission Regulation. This research recommends that improvements should be made by issuing Judicial Commission Regulations that are no longer considered laws and regulations, but rather internal regulations.

Keywords: Judicial Commission Regulation; Hierarchy of Laws and Regulations; Judicial Review.


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Alamsyah, H. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Kedudukan Dan Kekuatan Hukum Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum (PKPU) Dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.

Anggono, B. D. (2018a). Tertib Jenis, Hieraki, dan Materi Muatan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan: Permasalahan dan Solusinya. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 47(1), 1–9.

Anggono, B. D. (2018b). Tertib Jenis, Hierarki, Dan Materi Muatan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan: Permasalahan Dan Solusinya. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 47(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.1.2018.1-9

Anggono, B. D., & Mardika, N. Y. (2021). Konsistensi Bentuk Dan Materi Muatan Surat Edaran Sebagai Produk Hukum Dalam Penanganan Covid-19. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 50(4), 351–362.

Christiani, T. A. (2016). Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006

Fathorrahman. (2018). Peraturan Delegasi Dalam Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. JURNAL RECHTENS, 7(2), 193–212. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

Freeman, S. (1991). Constitutional Democracy and the Legitimacy of Judicial Review. Law and Philosophy, 9(4), 327–370.

Gusmansyah, W. (2019). Trias Politica Dalam Perspektif Fikih Siyasah. Al Imarah : Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik Islam, 2(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.29300/imr.v2i2.1448

Huda, N. (2021). Kedudukan Dan Materi Muatan Peraturan Menteri Dalam Perspektif Sistem Presidensial. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 28(3), 550–571. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss3.art5

Ilyas, A. (2022). Problematika Pertauran Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Implikasinya. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(4), 794–818.

Kalyvas, A. (2006). The basic norm and democracy in Hans Kelsen’s legal and political theory. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 32(5), 573–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453706064898

Kelsen, H. (1974). General Theory of Law and State. Russell & Russell.

Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.

Maulana Sikumbang, S., Ahlan Sjarif, F., & Yahdi Salampessy, M. (2019). Ilmu Perundang Undangan. In Hkum4403: Vol. 1.3.

Nurhayati, Y., Ifrani, I., & Said, M. Y. (2021). Metodologi Normatif Dan Empiris Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14

Rahmadhony, A., & Rosyadi, A. R. (2022). Peraturan MPR, DPR, Dan DPD: Internal Regulation Atau Peraturan Perundan-Undangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(4), 436–449.

Saputra, F. (2013). Kedudukan Komisi Yudisial Sebagai Lembaga Negara. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, 1(1), 1–9. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/fvm939e.pdf

Satriawan, I., & Lailam, T. (2019). Open Legal Policy dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(3), 559. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1636

Sihombing, E. N. A. ., & Hadita, C. (2023). Kewenangan Presiden Membentuk Undang-Undang Dalam Sistem Presidensial. Reformasi Hukum, 27(1), 12–20. https://ojs.uid.ac.id/index.php/jrh/article/view/491

Sikumbang, S. M., Sjarif, F. A., & Salampessy, M. Y. (2019). Pengantar Ilmu Pengetahuan Perundang- undangan (1 ed.). Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Simarmata, R. (2008). Penelitian Hukum: Dari Monodisipliner Ke Interdisipliner. Rsialah Hukum, 1(1), 48–53.

Sjarif, F. A. (2017). Gaya Perumusan Kalimat Perintah Pembentukan Peraturan Yang Menjalankan Delegasi Dari Undang-Undang Di Indonesia. Palar | Pakuan Law Review, 3(2), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v3i2.396

Tamin, B. E. D. (2018). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kedudukan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (Perma) Dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia. Lex Administratum, VI(3), 112–121.

Thontowi, J. (2011). Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 18(2), 185–302. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol18.iss2.art8

Wicaksono, D. A., Sandi, A., & Tabusassa, A. (2021). Mencari Jejak Konsep Judicial Restraint Dalam Praktik Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(1), 177–203.

Yarni, M., & Amanda, K. R. (2024). Pengaturan Inkonstitusional Bersyarat pada Kewenangan Pengujian Formil Undang–Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar. Jurnal Konstitusi, 21(4), 635–655.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v7i2.2878

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Jumlah Kunjungan

Negara Pengunjung

Flag Counter

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.