ANALISIS PERAMPASAN ASET TANPA PUTUSAN PIDANA DALAM PENEGAKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA
Sari
Abstract: Non-Criminal Asset Forfeiture allows the state to confiscate the proceeds of crime without waiting for a court decision. Because it is not strictly regulated in Indonesia's civil law system, asset recovery is often hampered. To address this gap, the law on asset forfeiture was drafted to strengthen the effectiveness of law enforcement, particularly in corruption cases. This research raises two main problem formulations: (1) the urgency of regulating asset forfeiture without a criminal judgment in the Indonesian legal system; and (2) the effectiveness of implementing the mechanism for prosecuting corruption crimes. The research method used is normative jurisprudence, with a legislative approach and literature review. The results show that the Non-Criminal Asset Forfeiture regime is important for accelerating the process of recovering state assets and closing legal loopholes that perpetrators of corruption often exploit. Although there are challenges in its application, such as potential human rights violations, this mechanism can operate effectively with strict legal oversight and protection.
Keywords: Asset Forfeiture, Corruption, Asset Forfeiture Bill.
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Konstitusi dan Hak Asasi dalam Negara Hukum. Konstitusi Press.
Chandranegara, I. S. (2020). Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Materiel Indonesia. Prenadamedia Group.
Greenberg, T. S. (2009). Stolen Asset Recovery: A Good Practices Guide for Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
Hamzah, A. (2016). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta.
Husein, Y. (2019). Penjelasan Hukum tentang Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan. Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia.
Indonesia, K. A. R. (2024). Kejagung: Negara rugi Rp310,61 triliun akibat dugaan korupsi pada 2024. In Antara News. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4557990/kejagung-negara-rugi-rp31061-triliun-akibat-dugaan-korupsi-pada-2024
Korupsi, K. P. (2020). RUU Perampasan Aset: Upaya Serius Kembalikan Aset Negara. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/berita/siaran-pers/2773-pentingnya-ruu-perampasan-aset
Korupsi, K. P. (2023). Laporan Tahunan KPK 2023. https://kpk.go.id/id/berita/laporan-tahunan-kpk-2023
Latifah, M. (2015). Urgensi Pembentukan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Negara Hukum, 6(2), 111–120.
Elfrida Ratnawati, Legal Compliance On The Road As The Effort To Overcome Jakarta’s Traffic Congestion, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Volume 19, Nomor 3, 2020.
Elfrida Ratnawati, Pelabuhan Indonesia sebagai penyumbang devisa negara dalam perspektif hukum bisnis, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 19, Nomor 3, 2017.
Elfrida Ratnawati, The Impacts of Government Policy on Covid-19 to Airlines Liability: A Case Study in Indonesia, Jambura Law Review, Volume 3, Number 1, 2017
Laurensius Arliman S, Elfrida Ratnawati, Aida Abdul Razak, Legal Guarantees for Persons with Disabilities to Secure Decent Work: A Human Rights Perspective from Indonesia, Volume 8, Nomor 2, Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 2024.
Laurensius Arliman S, Peranan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum di Dalam Perkembangan Ilmu Hukum di Indonesia, Soumatera Law Review, Volume 1, Nomor 1, 2018
Nasional, B. P. H. (2012). Naskah Akademik RUU Perampasan Aset.
Pemerintah dan DPR Serius Bahas RUU Perampasan Aset, Tetapi Harus Dikaji Mendalam. (2025). In Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. https://kemenkumham.go.id/berita-utama/pemerintah-dan-dpr-serius-bahas-ruu-perampasan-aset-tetapi-harus-dikaji-mendalam?csrt=15522139510381062232
Qomariah, N. (2020). Perampasan Aset Tanpa Putusan Pidana dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 50(4), 861–880.
Rahardjo, S. (2008). Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Kompas.
Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Perampasan Aset. (2012).
Romadhani, A. L., & Hartiwiningsih. (2021). NCBAF sebagai Formulasi Baru Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi. Recidive, 10(1), 64–73.
Saputra, R. (2017). Tantangan Penerapan Perampasan Aset Tanpa Tuntutan Pidana (Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture) dalam RUU Perampasan Aset di Indonesia. Jurnal Integritas, 3(1), 118.
Tantimin. (2023). Penyitaan Hasil Korupsi Melalui Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5(1), 85–102.
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (1999).
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (2010).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v7i3.3231
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Negara Pengunjung
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.