PARADOKS PEMBANGUNAN DAN KRISIS PERLINDUNGAN LINGKUNGAN

Nida Silvia Lestari, Syarkawi Syarkawi

Sari


Economic development in developing countries, including Indonesia, faces a fundamental paradox between the pursuit of economic growth and the escalating crisis of environmental protection. Development strategies that prioritize economic expansion, natural resource exploitation, and accelerated investment have contributed significantly to environmental degradation, such as deforestation, pollution, and the increasing frequency of ecological disasters. This condition reflects a persistent gap between normative commitments to sustainable development and actual policy implementation. This study aims to analyze the development paradox and environmental protection crisis in Indonesia from the perspective of public policy and environmental governance. The research employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method, examining academic journals, policy documents, and official reports from national and international institutions. Data are analyzed through thematic content analysis to identify key patterns and structural issues within development and environmental policies. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s environmental protection crisis is structural in nature, driven by weak law enforcement, overlapping regulations, limited institutional coordination, and largely formalistic public participation. This development paradox has resulted in heightened socio-ecological risks and environmental injustice. The study emphasizes the necessity of reorienting development paradigms toward an integrative sustainable development approach, where strengthened environmental governance becomes a fundamental prerequisite for long-term welfare sustainability and social equity in Indonesia.

Keywords: development paradox, environmental protection, public policy, environmental governance, Indonesia.


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. (2024). Data dan informasi bencana Indonesia. https://www.bnpb.go.id

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Analisis pembangunan berkelanjutan Indonesia. BPS.

Bryant, R. L., & Bailey, S. (1997). Third world political ecology. Routledge.

Climate Action Tracker. (2024). Indonesia country assessment. https://climateactiontracker.org

Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.244

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2025). Status hutan dan kehutanan Indonesia. KLHK.

Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. Universe Books.

Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press.

Situmorang, H., Agustia, R., Sunariyanto, S., Jailani, H. Y., Al-Ra'zie, Z. H., Latifa, D., ... & Windra, P. (2025). Buku Ajar Kebijakan Publik. Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah.

Syarkawi, S., & Maulana, M. A. (2025). ISU GENDER DALAM MANAJEMEN BENCANA DAN LINGKUNGAN DI INDONESIA. Ensiklopedia Social Review, 7(1), 141-147.

United Nations Development Programme. (2018). Governance for sustainable development. UNDP.

United Nations. (2025). Indonesia’s updated nationally determined contribution. https://indonesia.un.org

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v8i2.3670

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Jumlah Kunjungan

Negara Pengunjung

Flag Counter

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.