PRINSIP DUE PROCESS OF LAW DALAM PEMBARUAN HUKUM ACARA PIDANA TERHADAP EKSISTENSI PRAPERADILAN
Sari
Pretrial is a means of evaluating the investigation, inquiry, and prosecution process. The dynamics of criminal procedural law reform touch on the pretrial aspect to ensure due process of law. The principle of due process of law is a fundamental pillar in a state based on the rule of law that guarantees the protection of human rights, particularly in the criminal justice process. This article aims to analyze the principle of due process of law in the reform of criminal procedural law regarding the existence of pretrial. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. The results of the discussion indicate that the principle of due process of law in the reform of criminal procedural law regarding the existence of pretrial still requires improvement, not only in the regulatory aspect regarding the object and subject of pretrial, especially in the aspect of pretrial organizers as the executor of authority. Integrity, professionalism, and uniformity of interpretation of pretrial are mandatory, so that the norms that aspire to realize due process of law do not lose their meaning in their orientation. Pretrial does not only function as a procedural instrument, but also as a substantive means to guarantee the protection of human rights, legal certainty, and justice in accordance with the principle of due process of law. Furthermore, the legal implications of the reform of criminal procedural law regarding the existence of pretrial proceedings open up space for both the object and subject of pretrial proceedings. However, there is potential for functional degradation if it does not address the administrative aspects, including the single judge and the duration of the trial. Pretrial proceedings are still implemented formally and are limited to purely procedural aspects without substantial testing.
Keywords: Due Process of Law, Criminal Procedure Law, PretrialTeks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Edisi Revisi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2017
Barda Nawawi Arief, “Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Perspektif HAM”, Jurnal Hukum Prioris, Vol. 4 No. 3, 2014
Eddy O.S. Hiariej, “Pembaruan Hukum Acara Pidana dan Penguatan Due Process of Law”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 17 No. 4, 2020
Edward Coke, The Second Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, London, 1642
Faisal Santiago, “Keadilan Prosedural dan Akses Bantuan Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana”, Jurnal Supremasi Hukum, Vol. 8 No. 2, 2019.
Herbert L. Packer, The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1968
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Konstitusi dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005
_______________, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2015
John Locke, Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988
Lilik Mulyadi, “Praperadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 23 No. 1, 2016
Ni’matul Huda, “Perluasan Kewenangan Praperadilan Pasca Putusan MK”, Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Vol. 5 No. 2, 2016
Roni Sulistyanto Luhukay, “Problematika Praperadilan dalam Perlindungan Hak Tersangka”, Jurnal Yudisial, Vol. 11 No. 3, 2018
Zainal Arifin Mochtar, “Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Praperadilan”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 12 No. 1, 2015
____________________, “Kontrol Yudisial terhadap Tindakan Aparat Penegak Hukum”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 12 No. 1, 2015,
https://jdih.kemenkoinfra.go.id/en/uu-202025-kitab-undang-undang-hukum-acara-pidana?utm_source
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v8i2.3706
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Negara Pengunjung
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.