SIFAT KEPUTUSAN BADAN PENGAWAS PEMILIHAN UMUM DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PEMILIHAN UMUM

Mia Siratni

Sari


Bawaslu resolves by deliberation by bringing together the disputing parties to then take a final and binding decision. The final and binding nature of this Bawaslu decision does not apply to certain disputes, namely the dispute over the verification of political parties participating in the General Election and the determination of the final list of candidates for the election of members of the DPR, DPD, and DPRD. The existence of these two characteristics of Bawaslu's decision then led to different interpretations between Bawaslu and the KPU. The formulation of the problem, namely 1). The authority of Bawaslu in resolving election disputes regarding the task of supervising the implementation of elections, 2). The nature of Bawaslu's decisions in resolving election disputes. The research method used in this paper is normative juridical, namely an approach to legal norms or applicable laws and regulations, theories, and history. From the discussion of the problem, it is concluded that a decision that is final and binding is given to Bawaslu by law in order to end election disputes so that it will show the role of Bawaslu as a unified function of organizing elections. Meanwhile, exceptions to the nature of final and binding decisions on political party verification disputes and the permanent list of candidates for members of the DPR, DPD, and DPRD indicate that Bawaslu is not a judicial institution, so it cannot decide disputes related to constitutional rights as election participants.

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Dahlan Thaib, 1993, Implementasi Sistem Ketatanegaraan Menurut UUD 1945, Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Didik Sukriono, Menggagas Sistem Pemilihan Umum, Jurnal Konstitusi PKK Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang Volume II Nomor 1 Juni 2009.

Didik Supriyanto, Dkk, 2012, Penguatan Bawaslu ; Optimalisasi Posisi, Organisasi, dan Fungsi Dalam Pemilu 2014, Perludem, Jakarta.

Firmanzah, 2010, Persaingan, Legitimasi Kekuasaan, dan Marketing Politik- Pembelajaran Politik Pemilu, Ed.1, Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, Jakarta.

Idul Rishan, 2013, Komisi Yudisial Suatu Upaya Mewujudkan Wibawa Peradilan, Genta Press, Yogyakarta.

Janedjri M. Gaffar, 2012, Politik Hukum Pemilu, Konstitusi Press, Jakarta.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2009, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, PT.RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta

_________, 2012, Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi, Ed.2, Cet.2, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

_________, 2013, Menegakkan Etika Penyelenggara Pemilu, PT.RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Jojo J Prihatmoko, 2003, Pemilu 2004 dan Konsolidasi Demokrasi, LP2I Press, Semarang.

Khairul Fahmi, 2012, Pemilihan Umum & Kedaulatan Rakyat, Ed.1 Cet.2, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Niā€™matul Huda, 2013, Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Edisi Revisi, Cet. 8, PT.RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

_________, 2009, Hukum Pemerintahan Daerah, Nusa Media, Bandung.

Nur Hidayat Sardini, 2011, Restorasi Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Di Indonesia, Fajar Media Press, Yogyakarta.

Soehino, 2010, Hukum Tata Negara, Perkembangan Pengaturan Dan Peleksanaan Pemilihan Umum Di Indonesia, Edisi Pertama, BPFE-Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto, 1986, PengantarPenelitian Hukum,Cet.3, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji, 2010, Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Ed.1, Cet.12, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Topo Santoso & Didik Supriyanto, 2004, Mengawasi Pemilu Mengawal Demokrasi, PT.RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Takdir Rahmadi, 2011, Mediasi : Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat, PT.RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

YW Sunindhia, 1996, Praktek Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan di Daerah, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v3i4.813

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Jumlah Kunjungan

Negara Pengunjung

Flag Counter

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.