KONSTITUSIONALISME BERNEGARA DAN KEPATUHAN TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

Beni Kharisma Arrasuli

Sari


The establishment of the constitution guarantor institute is aimed at making the constitutional rights of every citizen or state institution not easily harmed by power through legislation, so that in the amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia the Constitutional Court is present as an institution serving as the guarantor of the constitution. the number of legal norms that exist in a country and many institutions that are authorized to form them can be ascertained that the contradictions from the existing norms will require a dispute breaker institution, the character of the Constitutional Court's decision is final and binding to differentiate with other judicial institutions, as well as the decision of the Court bind the whole party without exception, not only the parties disputed but also public member, it is only the issue that arises into a problem after the Constitutional Court decides a case of reviewing laws that are considered contrary to the constitution, it should be the legislative body in this case such as the People's Representative Council and the President or other relevant state institutions obey the decision and implement it. However, because the Constitutional Court does not have an executive tool for the decision, it is still a great homework by this country, the ethics of state that should be prioritized by the parties in complying with the Court's ruling. This is study that will be the author’s explain in this paper.

Teks Lengkap:

Hal 184-192

Referensi


Ahmad Syahrizal, 2006, Peradilan Konstitusi Suatu Studi tentang Ajudikasi Konstitusional sebagai Penyelesaian Sengketa Normatif, Pradnya Pramita, Jakarta.

A. Ahsin Thohari, 2016, Hak Konstitusional dalam Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta.

Bambang Waluyo, 2002, Penelitian Hukum dalam Praktik, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Dahlan Thaib, Jazim Hamidi, Ni’matul Huda, 2015, Teori Hukum dan Konstitusi, Rajawali Press, Cet II, Jakarta.

Fatkhurohman, Dian Aminudin, dan Sirajudin, 2004, Memahami Keberadaan Mahkamah konstitusi di Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung.

F. Sugeng Istanto, 2007, Penelitian Hukum, CV. Ganda, Yogyakarta

Inosentius Samsul, 2009, Pengkajian Hukum Tentang Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Kementerian Hukum Dan Ham RI, Jakarta.

I DewaGede Atmaja, 2012, Hukum Konstitusi, Setara Press, Malang.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2006, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Jakarta.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2014, Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Jujun S. Suriasumantri, 1986, Ilmu dalam Perspektif Moral, Sosial dan Politik: Sebuah Dialog tentang Dunia Keilmuan Dewasa ini, Gramedia, Jakarta.

Mahfud MD, 2011, Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi, Rajawali Press, Jakarta.

Maruarar Siahaan, 2015, Hukum Acara Mahkamah konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Edisi II, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Martitah, 2013, Mahkamah Konstitusi dari Negative Legislature ke Positive Legislature, Cet-1, Konstitusi Press, Jakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 2006, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Widayati, Problem Ketidakpatuhan Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Volume IV No. 1 Januari - April 2017.

M Ali Safaat, Kekuatan Mengikat Dan Pelaksanaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, https://www.google.com/safaat.lecture.ub.ac.id, Kekuatan-Mengikat-dan-Pelaksanaan-Putusan-MK.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/esr.v1i2.284

Jumlah Kunjungan

Anda Pengunjung Ke- Flag Counter