PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA KARENA PELANGGARAN BERSIFAT MENDESAK PASKA UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA: PERSPEKTIF CRITICAL LEGAL STUDY

Hasnuldi Miaz

Sari


: This research aims to explain Article 52 paragraph 2 PP 35/2021 which regulates the reasons for Termination of Employment (PHK) due to urgent violations. This model of layoff provides compensation in the form of compensation and separation pay. Furthermore, Article 52 paragraph 3 PP 35/2021 states that employers can do this without a layoff notification letter. Thus, the assumption is that the process begins with bipartite negotiations, mediation, and the Industrial Relations Court/Supreme Court. This allegation is based on the application of the law so far and the provisions of Article 39 paragraph 2 and paragraph 3 of PP 35/2021. It requires bipartite negotiations between employers and workers if workers reject the layoff notification, then proceed according to the industrial relations dispute resolution mechanism. However, in practice, the application of this article varies, even in the context of its interpretation. This raises crucial issues, including: (1) how will layoffs be regulated due to urgent violations after the Job Creation Law? (2) How are layoffs due to violations pressing from a critical legal study perspective? To uncover these legal problems, normative research is used through philosophical, statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of this research conclude that the practice of implementing layoffs due to urgent violations often causes blunders. When workers refuse layoffs, employers ultimately have to return to the industrial relations dispute resolution mechanism. The author hopes that the Supreme Court will be willing to provide guidance on implementing layoffs due to urgent violations. Especially regarding the legality of unilateral layoffs carried out by the Company. There are at least two problems. First, regarding the time of termination of the employment relationship, whether following the Company's layoff letter or calculated from the time the PHI decision was read. Second, regarding compensation, whether an urgent violation can be qualified as a PP/PKB violation with compensation under Article 52 paragraph 1 PP 35/2021 considering the principle of presumption of innocence or whether it remains with the compensation amount regulated by Article 52 paragraph 2 

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Alim, M. (2010). Asas-Asas Hukum Modern Dalam Hukum Islam. Media Hukum, 17(1), 151–161.

Christiani, T. A. (2016). Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006

Dairani, D., & Ibad, S. (2022). Konsep Aliran Hukum Kritis Kaitannya Dengan Omnibus Law Uu Cipta Kerja: Kajian Filsafat Hukum. HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.35316/hukmy.2022.v2i1.42-53

Gunadi, F. (2020). Upah Proses Dalam Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(4), 858–878.

Hayat, R. S. (2021). Konsep Dasar Critical Legal Studies: Kritik Atas Formalisme Hukum. Hermeneutika: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 235–241.

Hazmi, R. M. (2018). Konstruksi Keadilan, Kepastian, dan Kemanfaatan Hukum dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 46P/HUM/2018. Res Judicata, 4(1), 23–45.

Jahar, A. S., Hazmi, R. M., & Adhha, N. (2021). Construction of Justice, Certainty, and Legal Use in the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 46 P/HUM/2018. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v9i1.11583

Manisha, T., Pakpahan, R., Ardhya, S. N., & Setianto, M. J. (2022). Terhadap Hak Tenaga Kerja Yang Mengalami Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Secara Sepihak Ditinjau Dari Undang- Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha e-Journal Komunikasi Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Auto Daya Keisindo mengajukan gugatan pada Pengadilan Negeri. e-Journal Komunikasi Yustisia, 5(11), 129–144.

Mustansyir, R. (2016). Landasan Filosofis Mazhab Hukum Progresif: Tinjauan Filsafat Ilmu. Jurnal Filsafat, 18(1), 15–25.

Suprapto, M. F. I. (1998). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan Dasar- Dasar dan Pembentukannya. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Suprapto, M. F. I. (2020). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan I: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan (Edisi Revi). Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Wibowo, R. F., & Herawati, R. (2021). Perlindungan Bagi Pekerja Atas Tindakan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja ( PHK ) Secara Sepihak. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(1), 109–120.

Wijaya, A., Solechan, & Suhartoyo. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Pengaturan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Dalam Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan Setelah Pengesahan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Dipoenogoro Law Journal, 11(2), 3. Diambil dari https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v6i4.2593

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Jumlah Kunjungan

Negara Pengunjung

Flag Counter

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.