BUDAYA HUKUM DEBITOR DAN KREDITOR TERHADAP ASAS ITIKAD BAIK DALAM PELAKSANAAN HOMOLOGASI

Mochamad Roland Perdana, Azwar Feisal, Elsi Kartika Sari

Sari


This study aims to analyze in depth the legal culture of debtors and creditors based on good faith in implementing the PKPU peace agreement. How the regulation of the principle of good faith in the peace agreement in the process of Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) based on UUK - PKPU and How the legal culture of business actors (debtors and creditors) influences the implementation of the principle of good faith in the implementation of the PKPU peace agreement is the main problem. This study is a normative study to examine in depth related to the legal culture regarding the implementation of good faith in the results of the agreement in PKPU. The statute approach and case study approach are the approaches used. The data used are primary data in the form of regulations related to UUK - PKPU and secondary data used are previous research and related information data. The results of this study indicate that the principle of good faith in the implementation of the peace agreement or homologation in PKPU is very important to ensure economic certainty and legal certainty for creditors and debtors. Cancellation of homologation is generally due to the debtor's default in fulfilling the terms of the homologation agreement, which can result in the homologation being revoked, automatically declaring the debtor bankrupt.

 

Keywords: Legal Culture; Homologation; Good Faith


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Adolf, Huala. 2024. “Prinsip Itikad Baik (Good Faith) Dalam Hukum Kontrak.” BANI Arbitration and Law Journal 1(1):26–42.

Agung, Mahkamah. 2019. P U T U S A N Nomor 343 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019.

Atmarazaqi, Fajrul Umam. 2017. “PEMBUKTIAN IKTIKAD BAIK DEBITOR DALAM PERJANJIAN PERDAMAIAN (PKPU).” UII 17(2):5–9.

Bahran, Khaerul. 2025. “PELUANG PERDAMAIAN DALAM PKPU SOLUSI MENGHIDARI KEPAILITAN.” Ensiklopedia Education Review 2(April):35–44.

Friedman, Lawrence M. 1975. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Irwanda, Tasya Gita, and Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Seliam. 2024. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Konkuren Terkait Wanprestasi Debitor Dalam Pembatalan Perdamaian Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.” Mavisha: Law and Society Journal 1(1):14–29. doi:10.15408/zv6xh388.

Kadang, Alifah Zhecarina, Ipah Farihah, and Mustolih Siradj. 2022. “Tinjauan Yuridis Kepailitan Akibat Pembatalan Homologasi Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.” JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH 4(3):815–36. doi:10.15408/jlr.v4i3.21420.

Al Kautsar, Izzy, and Danang Wahyu Muhammad. 2022. “Sistem Hukum Modern Lawrance M. Friedman: Budaya Hukum Dan Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat Dari Industrial Ke Digital.” Sapientia Et Virtus 7(2):84–99. doi:10.37477/sev.v7i2.358.

Mahkamah Agung RI. 2024. “Putusan Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024/PN Niaga Smg.”

Mantili, Rai, and Putu Eka Trisna Dewi. 2021. “Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Pkpu) Terkait Penyelesaian Utang Piutang Dalam Kepailitan.” Jurnal Aktual Justice 6(1):1–19. doi:10.47329/aktualjustice.v6i1.618.

Noorhaliza, Andi Kavenya. 2023. “Teori Penegakan Hukum Menurut Friedman Terkait Persoalan Penggunaan Narkotika Untuk Kepentingan Medis Relevansi Dengan Pertimbangan Moral Dan Hukum.” Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains Dan Sosial Humanioral 1(2):1–17. doi:10.11111/nusantara.xxxxxxx.

Presiden Republik Indonesia. 2004. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentangkepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

Putra, Nouval Rivaldi, Aal Fachrurozi, Nyulistiowati Suryanti, and Deviana Yuanitasari. 2023. “Penerapan Asas Itikad Baik Pada Pengalihan Hak Atas Tanah Terhadap Harta Debitor Pailit.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum 4(2):89–103. doi:10.55551/jip.v4i2.65.

Putusan Pn Jakarta Pusat. 2025. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/index/pengadilan/pn-jakarta-pusat/kategori/kepailitan.html.

Sihotang, Dian Pribadi. 2024a. “Ertanggungjawaban Debitor Terhadap Kreditor Konkuren Setelah Homologasi Perjanjian Perdamaian Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU).” Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Peradilan Dan Sosial Humaniora 1(2):01–12.

Sihotang, Dian Pribadi. 2024b. “Pertanggungjawaban Debitor Terhadap Kreditor Konkuren Setelah Homologasi Perjanjian Perdamaian Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang ( PKPU ) Dimilikinya Dari PT . Stareast Sejahtera Group Sebagai Yang Dituntut Dalam Hak-Haknya Yang Pembatalan Perjanjian P.” Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Peradilan Dan Sosial Humaniora 1(2):01–12.

Tejo, Eko Susanto, Hernawati RAS, and Yeti Kurniati. 2025. “Application of the Principle of Balance and Justice to Debtors Who Do Not Act in Good Faith Based on Law Number 37 of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment.” International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) 13(05):662–76. doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v13i05.lla01.

Thohir, Muhajirin. 2018. “PKPU Sebagai Instrumen Mitigasi Risiko Kreditur : Analisis Praktik Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Minoritas.” Mustika Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 04(2):1–8.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v8i1.3480

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Jumlah Kunjungan

Negara Pengunjung

Flag Counter

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.