KONSEP DASAR EVALUASI DALAM PAI
Sari
Learning evaluation in Islamic Religious Education (PAI) is a crucial aspect to ensure the achievement of educational objectives, which are not only oriented towards the cognitive domain, but also the affective and psychomotor domains. However, practice in the field shows that many educators still equate tests, measurements, assessments, and evaluations, resulting in a less comprehensive assessment process and inability to fully reflect student development. This study employed a qualitative-descriptive method through a literature review of educational evaluation theory books and relevant national and international journals to deeply analyze the basic concepts of evaluation and their urgency in Islamic Religious Education (PAI) learning. The results show that tests only function as measuring tools; measurements provide quantitative values; assessments gather comprehensive information about the learning process and outcomes; while evaluation is a comprehensive assessment of learning effectiveness. The main findings emphasize that evaluation in PAI must be carried out authentically, continuously, and touch on three competency domains in order to encourage the formation of Islamic character, improve the quality of the learning process, and provide a basis for improving teaching strategies. This article provides a theoretical contribution by clarifying the conceptual distinctions between these terms and offers a more relevant evaluation framework for PAI educators.
Keywords: learning evaluation, assessment, testing, measurement, Islamic Religious Education, authentic, Islamic character
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Abdul Majid. 2015. Penilaian autentik dalam pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arifin, Z. 2011. Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arifin, Z. 2016. Evaluasi pembelajaran: Prinsip, teknik, dan prosedur. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arikunto, S. 2013. Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan . Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Bloom, B. S. 1964. Taxonomy of educational objectives: Affective domain . New York: David McKay.
Darmiyati Zuchdi. 2011. Pendidikan karakter dalam perspektif teori dan praktik. Yogyakarta: Multi Presindo.
George, M. W. 2008. The elements of library research. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Mulyasa, E. 2013. Standar kompetensi dan sertifikasi guru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. 2014. Educational assessment of students. Boston: Pearson.
Nana Sudjana. 2017. Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ralph W. Tyler. 1949. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rick Stiggins. 2014. Student-involved assessment for learning. Boston: Pearson.
Stufflebeam, D. 2003. The CIPP model for evaluation. Ohio: Western Michigan University Press.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. 2007. Evaluation theory, models, and application. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Anas Sudijono. 2012. Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Abdul Majid. 2015. Penilaian autentik dalam pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
E. Mulyasa. 2013. Standar kompetensi dan sertifikasi guru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Susan M. Brookhart. 2013. How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. Alexandria: ASCD.
Darmiyati Zuchdi. 2011. Pendidikan karakter dalam perspektif teori dan praktik. Yogyakarta: Multi Presindo.
Shepard, L. A. 2000. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7).
Hamka. 2015. Tafsir Al-Azhar (Jilid 7, hlm. 45; Jilid 9, hlm. 122; Jilid 10. Jakarta: Gema Insani.
Quraish Shihab. 2002. Tafsir Al-Mishbah (Jilid 12; Jilid 14; Jilid 29; Jilid 10. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v8i2.3621
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Negara Pengunjung

Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.










