APPLICATION OF GUIDED-NOTE TAKING METHOD WITH HANDOUT IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING FOR GRADE X (TEN) OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN SMAN 1 HILIRAN GUMANTI SOLOK
Sari
This research is a quasi-experimental research with a randomized control group only design for its research design. The population for this research is all grade ten students in SMAN I Hiliran Gumanti who are divided into three class namely class X.1, X.2, and X.3. The sampling technique is random sampling after applying the normality and the homogeneity test for the three classes and then randomly select two classes as the sample class by drawing numbers. The drawing selects X.3 as the experimental class and X.1 as the control class. The data obtained from the final test of the two classes are processed and then interpreted.
The result shows that the average final test score from the experimental class is higher than the control one, which is 69.7 and 60.5 respectively. The student activities during the learning process also observed and then processed with percentage techniques. The conclusion attained is positive activities during the learning process in the experimental class are increased whereas the negative activities decreased.
Lastly, the final test data processing obtained by using a t-test. The result is t-value > t-table (1.794 > 1.654), it shows that the proposed hypothesis is accepted. This means that the application of guided note-taking with handout is successfully rising-up the student’s mathematics score in SMAN I Hiliran Gumanti.
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
. 2001. Al-Qur’an Karim. Jakarta: Toha Putra
Ali, Muhammad. 2008. Guru Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo Offset
Andriani, Fitri.2011.Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Yang Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Luck Dip Disertai Media Chart Dengan Pembelajaran Konvensional Pada Kelas VIII MTSn Parak Laweh Padang. Padang: IAIN IB
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Aziz, Nasrullah.1989. MAteri Penataan Theacing Method 1 Bagi Dosen “FPTK” IKIP Padang, Jakarta, Surabaya dan Ujung Pandang. Padang
Davies, K. Ivor. 1987. Pengelolan Belajar. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Dimyati dan Mudjiono. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
M. Muslim, Ikhwanul. 2010.Ketuntasan Belajar Dengan Startegi Pembelajaran Ulang Dan Pemberian Tugas Rumah Di Kelas X Program Keahlian Bisnis Manajemen SMKN 4 Padang. Padang: IAIN IB
Mekarina. 2007. Penggunaan Metode Mencatat Dengan Bimbingan Melalui LKS Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa Kelas XI SMA Pertiwi 1 Padang. Padang: UNP
Muhammad, Syah. 1994. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada
Muliyardi. 2003. Strategi Belajar Mengajar Matematika. Padang, FMIPA UNP
Nasution. 1997. Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Nurtain. 1990. Survey Evaluasi Hand Out MKDK Dalam Pelaksanaan Kurikulum IKIP Padang. Padang: IKIP
Prawironegoro, Pratiknyo. 1985. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Khusus Analisis Soal di Ruang-ruang Kelas. Jakarta: Grafindo.
Ramayulis. 2010. Ilmu Pendidkan Islam. Jakarta: Kalam Mulia
Sanjaya, Wina. 2005. Pembelajaran Dengan Implementasi Kurikulum Berasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Kencana
Santoso, Singgih. 2001. SPSS. Jakarta : Gramedia
Sardiman, A. M. 2006. Interaksi dan Motivasi dalam Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
Sekolah.data.Kemendikbud.go.id.
Silberman, Melvin. L. 2006. Active learning. Bandung: Nusamedia dan Nuansa
Sudijono, Anas. 2005. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Sudjana, Nana. 2004. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung, Remaja Rosdakarya
Suryabrata, Sumadi. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v2i3.463
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Negara Pengunjung
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.