PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN MEREK DAGANG INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG MEREK
Sari
This study examines the protection of international trademarks, which still faces several challenges, ranging from low business awareness of the importance of trademark registration, weak law enforcement, and a suboptimal trademark registration administration system in Indonesia. The case of the Canadian brand Arc'teryx serves as a concrete example, where the brand's unregistered status in Indonesia resulted in the loss of legal protection within the national territory. Based on the principles of territoriality and first-to-file, the Chinese company that first registered the Arc'teryx brand in 2019 obtained legal rights to the brand in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to identify the obstacles that arise in the protection and legal enforcement of international trademarks in Indonesia, and to formulate effective strategies to strengthen this legal protection system. This study also examines applicable legal provisions, both nationally through Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, and in the context of international agreements governing cross-border intellectual property protection. The research method used is normative legal research, an approach that focuses on the analysis of relevant laws and regulations, legal literature, and international legal instruments. The research findings emphasize the importance of updating international trademark protection policies, improving legal awareness among businesses—especially in the MSME sector—and strengthening coordination between relevant institutions in law enforcement. With the implementation of a comprehensive strategy, Indonesia is expected to strengthen its intellectual property protection system and create a fairer, healthier, and more competitive business climate.
Keyword: International Brands, Legal Protection, Law Enforcement, Intellectual Property.
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Abdul Atsar. (2018). Mengenal Lebih Dekat Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Yogyakarta: Deepublish. Hlm. 4-5.
Abdulkadir Muhammad, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.
Achmad Chosyali. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Hak Cipta Buku Pengetahuan Ditinjau dari Undang- Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Refleksi Hukum, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, 3(1), hlm.50.
Al'Uzma, F., Saidin, O. K., Azwar, T. K. D., & Andriati, S. L. (2023). Analisis Putusan dan Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Perkara Sengketa Merek antara Starbucks Corporation
Melawan Sumatera Tobacco Trading Company:(Studi Putusan Makamah Agung Nomor 836 K/PDT. SUS-HKI/2022). Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 355-364.
Annisa Siregar, OK.Saidin, Jelly leviza. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Hak Atas Merek Pada Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah. Locus Journal Of Academic Literature Review, 3(1),hlm. 161.
Anriyani, Dian. "Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Rahasia Dagang Melalui Lembaga Arbitrase Dan Pengadilan Negeri." Jurnal Globalisasi Hukum 2.1 (2025): 74-89.
Badung, D. A. D. I. C. (2019). Transformasi Trips Agreement Terhadap Pasal 5 Ayat 1 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2000 Tentang Desain Industri (Doctoral dissertation, Udayana University).
Jamlean, Rozikin. "Analisis Putusan Nomor 60/Pdt. Sus. Hak Cipta/2020/Pn. Niaga Jkt Pst Atas Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Hak Cipta Program Komputeranalysis Of Decision Number 60/Pdt. Sus. Copyright/2020/Pn. Niaga Jkt Pst On Legal Protection Of Computer Program Copyright Holders: Analysis of Decision Number 60/Pdt. Sus.
Copyright/2020/PN. Niaga Jkt Pst on Legal Protection of Computer Program Copyright
Holders." Jurnal Globalisasi Hukum 1.2 (2024): 178-199.
Janed, Rahmi. (2015). Hukum Merek (Trandenmark Law) Dalam Era Globalisasi Dan Intergrasi Ekonomi. Jakarta: Prenandamedia Group. Hlm. 68.
Jesicca, Perlindungan Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual Atas Merek Terkenal Terhadap Barang Dalam Transaksi E-Commerce Di Indonesia, Jurnal Globalisasi Hukum, Vol. 2 No. 1,Maret 2025.
Nopiana, N., & Disemadi, H. S. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Hak Merek: Suatu Kajian Komparatif Antara Jepang Dan Indonesia. Widya Yuridika, 4(2), 389 400.
Muhib, Nidzom, and Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom. "Penyelesaian Masalah Pemboncengan Reputasi Terhadap Merek Terkenal Menurut Teori Friedman." Ensiklopedia of Journal 5.4 (2023): 553-561.
Nainggolan, I. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Perbuatan Penggunaan Merek Yang Sama Pada Pokoknya Tanpa Izin (Analisis Putusan MA. RI No. 2037/Pid.
Sus/2015). EduTech: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial, 5(1).
Pantow, Fickry Petrus. "Perlindungan Hukum Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah Terhadap Platform Social Commerce: Legal Protection for Micro Small Medium Enterprises
Against Social Commerce Platform." Jurnal Globalisasi Hukum 1.2 (2024): 249-274.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum (Cet. XV, 2021, Jakarta: Kencana). Pinem, Rocky FJ, and Elfrida Ratnawati. "Restorative Justice Dalam Tindak Pidana Merek (Analisis Teori Penegakan Hukum)." Ensiklopedia of Journal 6.2 (2024): 303-308.
Ratnawati, Elfrida, Faruqy Nailufar, and Rosdiana Rosdiana. "Perlindungan Konsumen Atas Penyebaran Berita Bohong Melalui Transaksi Elektronik Yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian Konsumen." Jurnal de jure 15.1 (2023). Riviyusnita, R., & Kesuma, D. A. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Merek Asing Terkenal Terhadap Peniruan Merek Yang Menyebabkan Persaingan Curang Menurut Uu No. 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek. Disiplin: Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda, 27(2), 74-83.
Rizkia, N. D., & Fardiansyah, H. (2022). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Suatu Pengantar. Widina Bhakti Persada.
Safira Jihan Aliandani, Kami Hartono. (2020).Judicial Review of Legal Protection Against Famous Trademarks (Based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications). Hlm. 498.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33559/esr.v7i3.3574